Cheems (cheems.pet) (CHEEMS)

Look at it this way

You see a token has no narrative, roughly speaking it's not interesting or there's a conflict in your head "how can this be interesting?" and so on

But at the same time the token has insane trading volume for something like that

What can that tell you?

That most likely someone is pumping the token artificially

Here are examples of such tokens

$CHEEMS 155K
73DRYB2YpoHiZUdq37hQmHTR7Yvg5qJKsxxaYrsJSBCJ

$DEER 24K
5exGpveFdn2Dcr9o7Pyj35DoYj588rEfkNLcZqHxpump

$Fauci 172K
3VFnDoACa991DYe987w354sbvmhqjjzC4Z31SoZepump

$FRANK 86K
3aqXuwp6HuVXs9vdD9Gpg4dzJaUx443RjK7GXzphpump

$BNUT 13K
H3GtwGSrYRVqp7dtjkaDfjE2inydLkHwFkFJSPzrpump

They're like from one family

Tokens like this need LP positions that are short in time

After that don't come back to them if you don't see the narrative developing and big influencers picking up the idea

Otherwise -90% and more, exactly what these tokens did

I made money on these tokens because I didn't sit in them long, I knew it was trash

Take care of your deposit

Dex only shows you the chart after a coin bonded.
Gmgn shows you the full story. Including the fact that the coin is very old and the middle line (average) is at 23k mc.

Mean reversal is real, if you buy very old coins you need an insane amount of motion. Fresh ones are better ngl

$CHEEMS (CA 73DRYB2YpoHiZUdq37hQmHTR7Yvg5qJKsxxaYrsJSBCJ) can't be analyzed with devsnightmare. shadowdahedgehog.sol, Chairman, 31337, imblankface, West, shah, Collectible, ivol.sol, mooncoinwhale.sol, Xav are top holders. 2% locked for 3638 days.

Cluster linked to mooncoinwhale has 3.6% on the bubblemap, another cluster has 3.2%. CEX cluster has 62.3%, Binance funded wallets have 15.8%, Coinbase 26.7%, Kraken 6.9%, Moonpay 5.6%, Revolut 4.2%, Bybit 3.3%, whitebit 3.3%, OKX 3.2%, Mexc 2.8%, Cryptocom 2.7%, Kucoin 1.5%.

Top 10 holders have 18.6%, 2.22k holders with an average bag at $490. Nfa