AI Real-time Tweet Analysis
Detect Market Pulse

Leveraging macro: https://t.co/UtJJm8netW digs into @Bitget’s new TradFi suite Read all about it in our hands-on-review! https://t.co/EHBT1KwsSS

An address poisoning scam has resulted in a $599K USDT loss after a victim sent funds to a lookalike address copied from transaction history, per @web3_antvirus. The attacker planted the fake address via a small transfer so it would appear alongside legit activity. The victim later copied an address and sent the funds to the attacker. [Brought to you by @web3_antvirus]

Today's market can only be described by a capitalized 'tragic'! However, whether it's the huge liquidation volume or the brewing pessimistic sentiment, there is a short‑term bottoming feel. The industry still needs to move forward, keep BUIDLing. Last month I got the Beta testing qualification for Anoma Pay from @anoma, did a simple interaction test, and it was quite interesting. First, although the Beta interface looks relatively simple, it is much better than the privacy products we used before; at least it is understandable at a glance. After connecting a wallet, Anoma automatically generates a privacy address for you. Taking one of my wallets as an example, the address is AuyLVoV4ZM9DP8nzHdAj4uwrE42ZTF8Eo2WsGedPbN1mAqLm1WTa9VkHxblnUySi4FEDSeCHXLJcWhLAzlZ6KMaTAh6FaGfOafVl3B62JPXYlQP5r9TOUa2XkARAsPkJlrZnGwFfY7-K2ZoEnppyQ4jshcMr7Nogqam9RAvmjrWUBy_gyaG5 Honestly, it's quite long... The project team said the address will be shortened in the future to make it less abstract. Then I sent a transfer to another beta tester in the group; the execution time was a bit slower than a normal transfer, taking about 5‑10 seconds, which is acceptable. Back when ETH was transitioning to POS, normal transfers took about the same time. After completing it, I looked at Basescan. You can see that apart from the From and To addresses, there is almost no traceable information, and the Value is also 0 ETH. The From address is not my direct address; it should be an address somewhat linked to my address. The To address is clearly the Anoma Pay privacy logic execution layer address, not the other tester's related address. For comparison, I randomly captured a transaction from Basescan; the exposed information is clearly much more than in my case. Since I'm not a scientist, I threw this transaction to Surf for analysis, and got the following results: Visible information analysis of the transaction: 1. No amount exposed: the Value field is 0 ETH, indicating the transferred amount is hidden, possibly through a privacy token or intent encapsulation. 2. No receiver exposure: the To field is the Anoma Pay contract address, not the final recipient; receiver information is in encrypted calldata or processed offline. 3. High privacy indicator: complex calldata (25.9% input data) and multiple event logs (e.g., ActionExecuted, ApplicationPayload) show the transaction involves ZK proof verification and privacy payload transmission rather than a simple transfer. 4. Sender balance unchanged: the sender's current balance is 0.0266433 ETH, same as before the transaction, confirming no

BILLIONAIRE RAY DALIO SAID THAT THE CURRENT MONETARY ORDER IS "BREAKING DOWN" AND "FIAT IS NO LONGER A CENTRAL BANK ASSET" BETTER BUY #BITCOIN 🔥🔥 https://t.co/3GOl3FmlDW

📣 $XRP: The XRPL has adopted an atomic settlement model based on the Bank for International Settlements' (BIS) Project Meridian—ensuring transactions are either fully completed or fully failed, eliminating partial settlements and reducing risks in cross-border payments 🔥 https://t.co/5DJR30Z6ad

Given that @Polkadot has joined OASES and has been officially recognized by the Hong Kong SAR Government as a strategic enterprise blockchain ecosystem—becoming the first blockchain project to receive this status in Hong Kong. https://t.co/Gv6byOs3Uf and considering China’s increasingly supportive policies toward RWA, could the @Web3foundation help facilitate collaboration between @Polkadot and Hong Kong’s RWA initiatives? 👀