Pump.Fun (PUMP)

According to Onchain Lens monitoring, an address flagged as related to the PumpFun team or investors has transferred approximately 23.4 billion PUMP to the Bitget exchange, valued at around $4 million. https://t.co/3oHvvhJSM3

Cashback Over Creator Fees: The Silent Meta Shift Making @Pumpfun Memecoins Actually Holder‑Friendly Fact: ~50.2% of new tokens on @Pumpfun | $PUMP now pay traders instead of creators, but most of you still fade it. As far as I witnessed, Cashback Coins feature is rewriting the entire game on memecoins trading. I’m watching a real-time structural shift where nearly half of all new launches are choosing to send the old ~0.3% creator fee slice straight back to traders and holders instead of letting it leak to the deployer. Look at the latest 14-day onchain snapshot pulled by @StalkHQ: – Total tokens created: 360,300. – Creator-fee tokens: 180,944 ~50.2%. – Cashback Coins: 179,320 ~49.8%; ~84K in the latest 7-day. The gap is just 1,624 tokens so Cashback is catching up fast. Pure community plays are defaulting to it at launch, locking in irreversible holder alignment. Dev/team coins still pick traditional fees when they want ongoing rev, but the split shows degens are voting with their launches: “No more farming your own holders.” The graduation rate is still brutal with 0.82% or ~2,958 winners out of 360k, which is exactly why this matters. You already know most coins die quick. Recycling fees to active traders instead of inactive creators improves the actual risk/reward for everyone in the arena. Dune dashboards make this crystal clear, shoutout @adam_tehc and @georgeo: The daily/ total share charts from @georgeo show the early explosion post‑launch, and the creator earnings dashboard is still printing healthy numbers. But remember, that $779k in the last 24h and $5.67M over 7 days is only from traditional fee tokens. Roughly half the recent launches generate zero for creators, that’s the compression signal. Platform volume is still strong, 22k+ tokens launched in the last 24h, lifetime revenue over $1B, so the cashback meta is sustaining engagement. I think this is the first time a major launchpad has given creators a genuine, at‑launch binary choice that actually favors holders. Cashback turns the old leak into on‑trade rewards claimable right in the Pumpfun Terminal. No CTO possible on cashback coins either so dev‑exit plays are dead on arrival. The market is self‑selecting with community memes go cashback, serious projects keep fees. Traders can finally filter and align accordingly. And when you zoom out and compare to the rest of Solana’s launchpads, Pumpfun’s dual model is in a league of its own right now. No one else offers this direct, irreversible fee‑to‑trader mechanic. Others are either creator‑first such as @moonshot funnels big % to deployers or ecosystem‑tied with indirect benefits with @bonk_inu buybacks, $BOOP rewards. None put cash straight back into traders’ wallets on every single buy/sell like Pumpfun’s Terminal does. That seamless, exclusive flow is the silent killer feature. I believe this shift proves $PUMP is maturing without losing its chaotic energy. Creators are voluntarily giving up easy extraction when the token is pure meme/community because the market is demanding it. Platform revenue might compress short‑term, but trader loyalty and repeat volume will more than make up for it long‑term. The data is already showing the meta moving toward holder‑first coins, and the gap is closing in real time. If you’re launching or trading memecoins on Solana right now, filter for cashback on Pumpfun. It’s the most aligned play in the entire meta. The silent shift just got loud and I’m all in on what this means for the next cycle of holder‑friendly coins.

Week 9 on @01Exchange, still the easiest perp farm 🔹 $4.72k volume 🔹 345 points 🔹 Weekly rank: 70 🔹 $0.0026 cost/point 01 remains the most simple & least time-consuming perp DEX to farm right now. No overtrading. No stress. No fee bleed. What changed this week Big shift: I traded $PUMP, the new listed asset → New pairs seem to be rewarded That alone boosted efficiency significantly. > Current setup (unchanged core) ~$200–$500 per position ~10 positions open (low OI, delta neutral) 2–3 trades per week Close only if funding turns too negative > Key takeaway → Trade new pairs early That’s where the edge is right now. Cost efficiency If done right, cost per point stays extremely low → RR is very strong > Program structure Private Mainnet (current phase) - 3,750,000 total points - 10 weeks (now week 9) - 375,000 pts/week ⏳ Only 1 week left Next: Public Mainnet Alpha -2,375,000 total points - 8 weeks -296,875 pts/week > Bonus: 2x farming While using 01, you're also accumulating points for @N1Chain (yet to launch) → Same activity, double exposure Access Private mainnet is invite only I still have some referral codes available 👇 https://t.co/VODMiEcNHb The logic If it flops → I lose almost nothing If it works → strong asymmetric upside Efficient farming > aggressive farming

the pumpfun team bought and burned 33% of the entire $PUMP supply in nine months. they are using trench pvp fees to quietly squeeze a $1.6b token. the house is buying back the casino.

IOSG: PUMP Valuation Breakdown, On-Chain Data Refutes the "Wash Trading" Theory, Where Does the Real Discount Come From? (Author Max Wong) Since the TGE, Pumpfun holds roughly $1 billion in cash reserves and continues to launch new product lines; in a natural market, the trading volumes of Launchpad and PumpSwap should be positively correlated with a time lag. Active Launchpad activity indicates strong speculative interest, and a portion of funds flows into PumpSwap through the graduation mechanism, supporting post‑listing trading. If severe wash trading occurs, Launchpad volume can be artificially inflated, causing the token to graduate based on fabricated activity curves and entering PumpSwap without genuine buyers. The result is a surge in Launchpad volume while PumpSwap volume remains flat or even declines, leading the correlation to approach zero or turn negative. Read the full article: https://t.co/0eG1koEpad

$PUMP Could Be Sitting On A Potential Macro Reversal Setup… Explosive Move Incoming? After A Long-Term Downtrend, Price Is Now Compressing Inside A HTF Accumulation Zone. This Is The Kind Of Structure That Often Precedes Parabolic Expansions. Key Points: → HTF Accumulation After Long Descending Wedge → Trading In Discount / Bearish Sentiment Zone → Strong Base Holding Above $0.0014 → Breakout Confirmation Above $0.0030 → Expansion Phase Likely If Base Holds When Price Stops Making New Lows And Starts Compressing… Smart Money Begins Positioning Before The Breakout. Retail Notices Only After Momentum Starts. Prediction / Bias: Bullish While $0.0014 Holds ( Accumulation Zone ) Breakout Targets: $0.00504 → $0.00867 → $0.015 → $0.02297+ Upside Potential: +1,500%+ If HTF Base Holds Do You Think Altseason Starts From Setups Like This?

I understand all the bear arguments / concerns, but at some point people are going to find 4x profit an attractive multiple, or @Pumpfun will simply buy back all the tokens. https://t.co/rWZIWxTzGA

I have long term view on most tokens in DeFi and a lotta patience for teams working through tough times, but I have absolutely no idea what reason Pump still has to exist. Ironically, the culture that promoted its grossly extractive behavior is partially why there's so much fatigue among liquid token investors now, and hence why great Solana team tokens are down so severely. These are extremely talented teams below, who IMO will be here in 4 years, but my god, as a founder or token holder, you should be so tired of some investors, builders, and advocates in your community promoting this shit. Attention and time is the most scarce asset in this market. The net-negative impact of pushing infinite worthless tokens, with a nihilistic flair, is still being priced into the bear market. Measuring from all-time-highs: PYTH (-96.8%) ORCA (96%) JTO (-95%) KMNO (-93%) GRASS (-93%) JUP (-92%) 2Z (-91.6%) MET (81.6%, but tbf it's a new token since Nov) BP (-68% from ATH, also new token at $140M FDV) DRIFT (97.5%, before the exploit) This is a true bear market purge happening. Ethereum eco tokens are down as well, but I just don't see the same sort of black cloud hanging over Ethereum DeFi. We've been through our own purge over the years but dear god, you ought to distance from such cancerous teams, despite their impressive fees and revenue ($2M fees and $1M revenue on a bad day for Pump). I just don't get it. I think it will die a painful death, eventually.