LAB (LAB)
- 69Chỉ số cảm xúc xã hội (SSI)- (24h)
- #63Xếp hạng nhịp đập thị trường (MPR)0
- 1Đề cập trên mạng xã hội 24h- (24h)
- 100%Tỷ lệ tăng KOL 24h1 KOL đang hoạt động
- Tóm tắtLAB received community compensation due to vesting dispute, added a 125k reward, but price slipped slightly 0.85%.
- Tín hiệu tăng giá
- additional 125k reward
- penalty fees distributed to holders
- community responded positively to the conflict
- Snaps campaign executed strongly
- reward pool enhances liquidity
- Tín hiệu giảm giá
- vesting extended to 9 months
- users dissatisfied with the terms
- price dropped 0.85%
- risk of trust erosion
- potential pressure of position withdrawals
Chỉ số cảm xúc xã hội (SSI)
- Tổng quan dữ liệu69SSI
- Xu hướng SSI (7 ngày)Giá (7 ngày)Phân bổ cảm xúcTăng giá (100%)Thông tin chuyên sâu SSILAB social heat index is moderately high (68.5/100), activity score full 40/40, sentiment positive 27.5/30, stimulated by the 125k reward compensation, KOL attention low 1/30.
Xếp hạng nhịp đập thị trường (MPR)
- Thông tin chuyên sâu về cảnh báoLAB warning rank #63, social abnormality high 89.22/100, caused by vesting dispute compensation triggering sentiment volatility, KOL attention shift only 1/100.
Bài đăng trên X
Cookie DAO 🍪 Media Community_Lead B199.82K @cookiedotfunImportant update on LAB We hear your concerns and understand your frustration with Lab’s vesting terms change, adding a 9 month cliff before the agreed 6-month vesting. We want to assure you that we stand firmly against such practices from projects and have enforced our agreement with Lab, applying the maximum penalty under their Snaps campaign terms. This penalty will be distributed to snappers and stakers. As a result @LABtrade_ will add an extra $125,000 in $LAB to the rewards pool. This will be distributed proportionally to all snappers and stakers and will follow the same vesting schedule. After multiple rounds of negotiations, this is the strongest resolution we can lock in right now for snappers and stakers. We will keep you updated on any further progress. Please check the Cookie Discord for more details.
294 159 13.40K Gốc >Xu hướng của LAB sau khi phát hànhTăng giáLAB adds $125,000 reward, boosting holder returns
onchainschool.pro OnChain_Analyst Educator A5.65K @how2onchain$LAB TEAM OUTFLOW Around 30 minutes ago, $LAB worth approximately $400K was deposited to Gate and Bitget from a team wallet Wallet: 0xF760B38e09282B11884a26E4fFb701Eb0bD8de99 https://t.co/WNjRu4jPpe
15 5 2.53K Gốc >Xu hướng của LAB sau khi phát hànhGiảm giáThe LAB team wallet transferred about $400K of tokens to exchanges, causing the token price to drop sharply.
onchainschool.pro OnChain_Analyst Educator A5.65K @how2onchain$LAB PARTIAL EXIT A $LAB whale has started partially depositing to exchanges assets accumulated since the beginning of the month Recently, over $250K in $LAB was deposited A smaller portion was also deposited 6 days ago The wallet still holds around $1.9M in $LAB Current estimated PnL is approximately +25% Wallet: 0xf1a95a75737878ef4b020f654ec98cab56540e4c
11 2 1.73K Gốc >Xu hướng của LAB sau khi phát hànhGiảm giáA LAB token whale is depositing a large amount of assets into exchanges, indicating potential sell pressure, but still holds most of the position.
Zamza Salim Influencer Educator B55.06K @Autosultan_team
Zamza Salim Influencer Educator B55.06K @Autosultan_teamCookie Response "We Don't Control Token Prices, Market Does" Yoooo GM CT @cookiedotfun just dropped a statement after multiple TGE opened -60% to -70% & community went nuclear. They're acknowledging people are mad, disappointed & exhausted Here's what they're saying (simplified) 🧵 ① "We don't control token performance" • projects set their own raise, economics, liquidity • cookie doesn't touch treasury or price tokens • they're just an InfoFi platform providing tools • if market dumps below raise » rewards shrink • if market pumps » rewards increase (like $LAB, $RECALL) • "that's just how TGE work across the industry" Translation: "Not our fault, market decides everything" ② "Reward numbers are estimates, not promises" • numbers shown are at FDV from public raise • it's a benchmark, not a guarantee • market decides final outcome • open lower » you get less • open higher » you get more Translation: "We showed you best-case scenario while market nuked it, that's on the market" ➂ "This hurts us too" • ba
152 97 9.89K Gốc >Xu hướng của LAB sau khi phát hànhGiảm giáCookiedotfun responds to TGE token crash, saying they don't control the price, the market decides everything.
Zamza Salim Influencer Educator B55.06K @Autosultan_teamCookie Response "We Don't Control Token Prices, Market Does" Yoooo GM CT @cookiedotfun just dropped a statement after multiple TGE opened -60% to -70% & community went nuclear. They're acknowledging people are mad, disappointed & exhausted Here's what they're saying (simplified) 🧵 ① "We don't control token performance" • projects set their own raise, economics, liquidity • cookie doesn't touch treasury or price tokens • they're just an InfoFi platform providing tools • if market dumps below raise » rewards shrink • if market pumps » rewards increase (like $LAB, $RECALL) • "that's just how TGE work across the industry" Translation: "Not our fault, market decides everything" ② "Reward numbers are estimates, not promises" • numbers shown are at FDV from public raise • it's a benchmark, not a guarantee • market decides final outcome • open lower » you get less • open higher » you get more Translation: "We showed you best-case scenario while market nuked it, that's on the market" ➂ "This hurts us too" • ba
152 97 9.89K Gốc >Xu hướng của LAB sau khi phát hànhGiảm giáCookie Capital Mindshare model leads to user losses, platform's non-responsibility sparks controversy.
Zamza Salim Influencer Educator B55.06K @Autosultan_teamCookie Response "We Don't Control Token Prices, Market Does" Yoooo GM CT @cookiedotfun just dropped a statement after multiple TGE opened -60% to -70% & community went nuclear. They're acknowledging people are mad, disappointed & exhausted Here's what they're saying (simplified) ① "We don't control token performance" • projects set their own raise, economics, liquidity • cookie doesn't touch treasury or price tokens • they're just an InfoFi platform providing tools • if market dumps below raise » rewards shrink • if market pumps » rewards increase (like $LAB, $RECALL) • "that's just how TGE work across the industry" Translation: "Not our fault, market decides everything" ② "Reward numbers are estimates, not promises" • numbers shown are at FDV from public raise • it's a benchmark, not a guarantee • market decides final outcome • open lower » you get less • open higher » you get more Translation: "We showed you best-case scenario while market nuked it, that's on the market" ➂ "This hurts us too" • bad launches discourage creators • users get frustrated, trust erodes • their model needs projects to deliver value • they only win long-term if creators feel rewarded & users don't feel rekt Translation: "We're aligned with you. If you lose, we lose too eventually" ➃ "We're listening & improving" • acknowledge people feel blindsided • will communicate estimates more clearly • improving due diligence with each launch • not running from hard conversations Translation: "We hear you, we'll do better, trust the process" What Cookie is Actually Said? "We're the middleman connecting projects & creators. We don't control what happens at TGE. Market conditions are brutal rn. Tokens are dumping across the board. Yeah, you got rekt, but so did everyone else. We'll try to communicate better, but ultimately the market decides outcomes, not us" But why? • why they vet projects that immediately dump 60-70%? • why estimates are always best-case FDV instead of realistic market scenario? • why creators farm for months only to get pennies? • whether their DD process is actually improving or just lip service? Cookie positioned as "We're just the platform, projects & market control outcomes. We're trying our best." Cookie stance, this is not their fault token is dump. Market decides. They're listening & improving DD Community feel "You profit from our attention either way, we're the ones left holding bags" Community take is, easy to say "not our fault" when you already got paid for running campaigns while creators got rekt Let's see it in the next month, we've @useTria & @RaylsLabs But yea fair or not, that's the tension rn
90 73 1.88K Gốc >Xu hướng của LAB sau khi phát hànhGiảm giáCookie platform responded to multiple TGE token crashes, stating that they do not control prices and that the market decides, but the community questions its responsibility and due diligence.
Quadrix FA_Analyst Educator A3.16K @Qu3drixneeded a good read? take your time on this banger from cookie this was a necessary and honest breakdown cookie doesn’t control token pricing or post-TGE performance lol it just provides the InfoFi rails, not the market outcome reward figures are estimates based on raise valuations, and in a market this tight, downside risk shows up fast, even for solid projects what stands out is the willingness to own what is controllable: clearer communication, better UX, and learning from each launch addressing frustration head-on instead of dodging it is how long-term trust is actually built gg @cookiedotfun
Cookie DAO 🍪 Media Community_Lead B199.82K @cookiedotfunWe know a lot of you are mad, disappointed, or exhausted with how the market’s been moving. When you watch a token open -60% to -70%, it doesn’t matter how many disclaimers exist, it hurts. And pretending otherwise would just be tone deaf. So let us explain, so you know where we stand: 1) Token performance on TGE and Post TGE isn’t determined by Cookie. Every project sets its own raise, its own economics, its own liquidity plans. We don’t touch treasury, we don’t price the token, we don’t control what happens at open. We’re an InfoFi platform: we provide tools for projects to run InfoFi campaigns and reward people who give them attention, content, and mindshare. If the market pushes something below the raise valuation, rewards drop. If it pumps above, rewards increase. (We’ve had those too: $LAB, $RECALL.) We’re not shifting blame, that’s just how TGEs function across the whole industry. Zooming out, the broader market is under serious pressure, liquidity constraints, heavy sell offs, and unpredictab
27 21 429 Gốc >Xu hướng của LAB sau khi phát hànhGiảm giáMarket under pressure, token performance affected by TGE valuation, project does not control price
The Crypto Professor FA_Analyst Influencer C38.08K @TheCryptoProfesThis is a solid reflective piece by Cookie and echos what I keep saying at the InfoFi space as a whole. For Cookie to win, it needs business. Continual business. This is the same for every InfoFi platform. Cookie gets business → Content creators engage → Projects get reach → Cookie gets business The flywheel only works if the value goes full circle, otherwise, people pivot. It won't be a success every time though. Projects have to deliver, and these markets have been absolutely shit, let's not sugar coat that for price action. Not every single project will succeed, but it is a percentage game. It's also up to you as a content creator to determine the value and risk to your time vs the potential reward.
Cookie DAO 🍪 Media Community_Lead B199.82K @cookiedotfunWe know a lot of you are mad, disappointed, or exhausted with how the market’s been moving. When you watch a token open -60% to -70%, it doesn’t matter how many disclaimers exist, it hurts. And pretending otherwise would just be tone deaf. So let us explain, so you know where we stand: 1) Token performance on TGE and Post TGE isn’t determined by Cookie. Every project sets its own raise, its own economics, its own liquidity plans. We don’t touch treasury, we don’t price the token, we don’t control what happens at open. We’re an InfoFi platform: we provide tools for projects to run InfoFi campaigns and reward people who give them attention, content, and mindshare. If the market pushes something below the raise valuation, rewards drop. If it pumps above, rewards increase. (We’ve had those too: $LAB, $RECALL.) We’re not shifting blame, that’s just how TGEs function across the whole industry. Zooming out, the broader market is under serious pressure, liquidity constraints, heavy sell offs, and unpredictab
45 7 2.54K Gốc >Xu hướng của LAB sau khi phát hànhGiảm giáMarket is sluggish, InfoFi platforms cannot determine token performance, creators need to assess risk
Carlitosway Influencer Community_Lead B31.38K @Carlitoswa_y
Cookie DAO 🍪 Media Community_Lead B199.82K @cookiedotfunWe know a lot of you are mad, disappointed, or exhausted with how the market’s been moving. When you watch a token open -60% to -70%, it doesn’t matter how many disclaimers exist, it hurts. And pretending otherwise would just be tone deaf. So let us explain, so you know where we stand: 1) Token performance on TGE and Post TGE isn’t determined by Cookie. Every project sets its own raise, its own economics, its own liquidity plans. We don’t touch treasury, we don’t price the token, we don’t control what happens at open. We’re an InfoFi platform: we provide tools for projects to run InfoFi campaigns and reward people who give them attention, content, and mindshare. If the market pushes something below the raise valuation, rewards drop. If it pumps above, rewards increase. (We’ve had those too: $LAB, $RECALL.) We’re not shifting blame, that’s just how TGEs function across the whole industry. Zooming out, the broader market is under serious pressure, liquidity constraints, heavy sell offs, and unpredictab
450 224 49.06K Gốc >Xu hướng của LAB sau khi phát hànhGiảm giáSevere market pressure causing most tokens to open down 60%-70%
onchainschool.pro OnChain_Analyst Educator A5.65K @how2onchain$LAB DAILY ACCUMULATION CONTINUES A wallet has been withdrawing $LAB from multiple exchanges every day for the past week 30 minutes ago, new inflows totaling $95K were recorded The wallet now holds approximately $1.2M worth of $LAB Wallet: 0xF1a95A75737878EF4B020F654eC98CAB56540e4C
13 2 2.19K Gốc >Xu hướng của LAB sau khi phát hànhTăng giáLAB token continues to be accumulated by whales, on-chain data indicates a potential bullish trend.