Chainlink (LINK)

@KlausSchwabx666 they were already prepared to buy $LINK at an average price of $23.66. Now at $9, they are gonna double down. Simple. Same as me. I have been getting more over the past week. Yummy!

$LINK $GLNK **Make sure to read my post** Especially for marines I want to be the voice of reason during these tough times. Always remember the asymmetric plays of the past $NVDA $AMZN $PLTR $AMD....had years where they just sat with atrocious price action. Don't let price action break you, thats what they want. Never use leverage, always hold spot and if playing options practice risk management and only put in what youre willing to loose. KNOW WHAT YOU HOLD and don't let anyone break your conviction as long as nothing fundamental has changed about the company. YOU WILL see a lot of flip flop influencers and accounts (even former marines) write bullshit and have breakdowns, IGNORE. Lets take a look at recent developments: -@RobinhoodApp expanding deeper into onchain infrastructure and tokenized markets using @chainlink as the oracle platform -@Polymarket running real time crypto markets powered by Chainlink data -@Arbitrum relying on Chainlink oracles as core infrastructure -@SergeyNazarov sittin

Anything less than every transaction on the planet being verified via consensus is a failure. Im here for the megatrend. Im here for the economies of scale. Chainlink and Swift are a decade into this. $LINK https://t.co/3brrOzZB0I

It's been a blast going through A TON of ideas for the @Chainlink Hackathon. I'm zeroing in on a couple of things but don't have "the one" yet. Confidential compute comes out in a few days for CRE, and I'm inclined to spin it it up. Either way I'm going to start building out some fun stuff this year I think.

Chainlink's Privacy solution will enable privacy across all chains, API queries,compliance checks, policy enforcement, identity and credential checks, and much more. Basically, *ALL* end to end workflows from offchain to onchain. To do this, you need a protocol that sits on top of and across all chains, which is also connected to legacy financial networks and web2 APIs. Chainlink is the only protocol that does this. If Chainlink enables ubiquitous privacy by default, then people won't be forced to own arbitrary assets simply because they have the property of privacy. Instead, you can make the assets you *already own* on their own merits simply be privacy-enhanced. While A16z thinks that a "handful of privacy chains can own most of crypto", they aren't considering an orchestration layer protocol that powers end to end privacy across *all chains.* Now, simply having privacy is no longer a competitive moat since its so readily available, but imagine what a competitive moat it is for the protocol that's res

$Link wanna know something crazy... With these numbers alone: SWIFT: ~$5T daily DTCC (FICC + NSCC): ~$17T daily Broadridge: ~$10T daily Euroclear: hard to peg, but for conservative math, let’s slot ~$5T daily (likely higher) Thats 37 trillion in daily value... lets take super linear staking into consideration... that would mean 3 trillion would have to be staked in nodes for security. If 50% is staked(eth is 40-59%) That makes it 6k a token. .. Thats without reserves.... No fees for messaging TX on CCIP. No Data feeds No Data streams NO por No Ace NO CCID NO atomic settlement fees No Cre No Keepers. No vrf NO HKMA.......and so much more. That is soley staked nodes...nothing else. Get it? That’s where the numbers start dwarfing the $6k “floor.” Bigger than you think anon. .

CHAINLINK: Delivering Privacy’s End-Game @SergeyNazarov called lack of privacy "the greatest barrier holding back large-scale institutional adoption of onchain finance."

CHAINLINK: Delivering Privacy’s End-Game @SergeyNazarov called lack of privacy "the greatest barrier holding back large-scale institutional adoption of onchain finance."

CHAINLINK: Delivering Privacy’s End-Game @SergeyNazarov called lack of privacy "the greatest barrier holding back large-scale institutional adoption of onchain finance."