Meteora (MET)

.@MeteoraAG has good unit economics for every $1 of incentives we probably do $3-6 of protocol fees this makes future season planning easier, but it doesn’t scale. subsequent airdrops will likely be smaller but accompanied by a lot of growth

[CRYPTODIFFER] Meteora Becomes Top DeFi Fee Generator in 2025 With $1.25 Billion $MET https://t.co/JJdHOa958D

Just in: MET airdrop claim window will officially close on January 23. Ngl, this was one of the best airdrops we've seen in a while. There were high 4-6 fig claims and a few 7 fig claim. Not long ago, the team reviewed the entries of contributors who were previously flagged as spam and some of the accounts luckily got in. You might want to check your eligibility again if you're a: > JUP staker > Contributor > Liquidity provider https://t.co/0XSksdE7Sd Shoutout to @MeteoraAG for keeping the claim window open for three months. It's quite rare these days for a project to do so. What's even more interesting is that the team did not stop shipping post TGE. In fact they entered ultra ship mode ever since. You might wonder: Now that S1 is over, what’s next? That there was an S1 program suggests an S2 in the horizon don't you think? BTW, here's what you can do in the meantime: > Learn to LP > Join bootcamps > Share what you learn > Practise and earn on Meteora > Join a Meteora community in your region That's a wrap for now.

$MET looks undervalued. ~$1M in 24h revenue, trading at ~$280M FDV. PUMP trades at $2B+ FDV with similar revenue, while JUP sits around ~$1.6B FDV with roughly half of MET’s revenue and aggressive monthly unlocks. MET has deployed $12M+ in buybacks to date. https://t.co/8XGFYFsLFB

The most undervalued token in the ecosystem? The DEX @MeteoraAG just had one of its biggest weeks in terms of generated revenue (historical data missing on @DefiLlama). → $4.34 M going into the protocol’s pocket. $MET is currently trading at a $140 M market cap and $280 M fully diluted valuation. Why such a low valuation given the protocol’s massive revenues ($108 M annualized)? What the market is looking for is utility and a clear structure for the $MET token. Always the same issue: token utility and alignment between token holders and the protocol. Co‑founder @0xSoju is exploring different models, such as @LaunchOnSoar, to improve this alignment: https://t.co/CwQvs7ZLwQ By the way, 2.9% of the supply has already been bought back, but in a random manner. I clearly think this is a token to watch closely with a very good risk/reward (R/R) ratio. One of the best ways to get exposure to the Solana ecosystem after the $PUMP, in my opinion. Patience, no bottom signs currently.

This is one of the cleaner ways I’ve seen a team frame token alignment. @MeteoraAG No equity games, no “value accrues somewhere else” mental gymnastics. Just: the token is the asset. Spending $12.2M to buy back 2.9% of supply without ever extracting cash from the token itself is a pretty explicit signal about priorities. Revenues aren’t treated as trophies they’re inputs: operate, grow, or return value depending on valuation and cash flow. The focus on Earnings Per Token matters more than most people admit. It forces discipline. You can’t hide behind vibes forever if the number has to make sense over time. Also interesting to see them openly explore structures like DRP instead of pretending token design is “done.” Safeguards aren’t anti growth they’re usually what lets growth last. Respect the clarity here. Thanks for putting it out in the open @0xSoju

Also follow the market maker's comment, and happened to see someone in the comment section mention $Met and $Wet Actually, take a look at the Solana data from the past week or two $Met - Revenue is strong, ranking second over the past 7 days; many projects below have far lower revenue than Met but much higher market caps Interestingly, we also saw two new faces that we hadn't seen before. Additionally, it's worth noting that the hot token $Ore is back in the top ten $Wet - Over the past 30 days it remains the absolute king of Solana Dex trading volume, yet its market cap still hasn't taken off If these two were in a bull market, they would have already taken off; this cycle hasn't been a good timing for them Of course, whether they caught the timing or not doesn't really matter. With good project data, the protocol can still earn a lot, and the only ones not making money are retail investors who bought at high levels… Truly, when the market rises, retail suffers; when it falls, retail suffers

one of the undervalued projects is Meteora and in this context of course their token $MET it’s one of the top protocols in terms of revenue i’m curious what their community is like, because the project isn’t exactly easy for regular users to understand https://t.co/4Ex7IQF95s