SUI (SUI)

🚨 ALERT: SEC Approves First 2x Leveraged $SUI ETF Trading on Nasdaq\n\n21Shares received regulatory greenlight for TXXS offering double exposure to Sui blockchain performance. Product provides amplified regulated access without requiring direct token ownership. Marks inaugural leveraged altcoin fund and first Sui presence in traditional markets. New investment vehicle available through major exchange infrastructure.

⚡️Breaking: SEC approves the first 2x leveraged SUI ETF "TXXS". Altcoin-related ETFs are finally getting underway. https://t.co/tWDLXyPXUQ

leveraged altcoin ETF's, what a great idea

Missed this earlier, 21Shares launched a 2x SUI ETF, first SUI ETF, rare first one is leveraged, happened with XRP too. They starting to add up now, this is the 74th crypto ETF launched this year and 128th overall. We expect another 80 in next 12mo. https://t.co/VgQoAbNouX

Most chains claiming parallel execution are lying to you They're bolting parallelism onto broken account models and calling it innovation SUI rebuilt the entire transaction layer instead The difference? One actually works. Let me explain why this matters ⬇️ Most chains use an account-based model inherited from Ethereum Every transaction locks the entire account state Even if you're just sending tokens to different people, the blockchain treats it as sequential One. At. A. Time. SUI's object model flips this completely Instead of locking entire accounts, it tracks individual objects Your NFT is an object Your tokens are objects Your position in a protocol is an object Each one can be modified independently without blocking others Here's a real example: You want to: • Swap tokens on a DEX • Claim staking rewards • Transfer an NFT On EVM chains? These wait in line, executed one by one On SUI? All three execute in parallel because they touch different objects Zero conflicts. But here's where it gets wild SUI validators can skip consensus entirely for simple transfers If a transaction only involves objects you own, it doesn't need network-wide agreement Just proof of ownership Sub-second finality without sacrificing security Compare this to other chains claiming parallel execution They're retrofitting parallelism onto account-based models It's like trying to make a horse-drawn carriage go faster by adding a turbocharger Vs building a car from scratch One is a hack, the other is engineering The security advantage? No reentrancy attacks No approval exploits No shared state vulnerabilities that plague EVM chains Objects have clear ownership and can't be manipulated mid-transaction The architecture itself prevents entire categories of exploits This is why SUI consistently hits 100k+ TPS in testing without breaking a sweat While other chains struggle to scale past 10k It's not about better hardware or more validators It's about fundamentally different transaction logic that was designed for parallelism from day one Bottom line: Speed without security is useless Security without speed limits adoption SUI proved you can have both But only if you're willing to rebuild from first principles instead of patching broken designs That's the difference between innovation and iteration

#SUI is trading below a long‑term downtrend but the 1.55 – 1.60 zone is a strong demand area. Price reacted from this zone. Short‑term resistance: 1.72 – 1.80. Major breakout zone: 2.00 – 2.10. Those who say the top will be #SOL, please step forward :) Need a close above $5. https://t.co/shL7115Bcx