Sky (SKY)
- 44ソーシャル・センチメント・インデックス(SSI)-30.62% (24h)
- #88マーケット・パルス・ランキング(MPR)-9
- 124時間ソーシャルメンション-50.00% (24h)
- 100%24時間のKOL強気比率1人のアクティブなKOL
- 概要SKY breaks below 0.07 support, enters a pullback, price down 8.5% over 24h.
- 強気のシグナルデータなし
- 弱気のシグナル
- Breaks below 0.07 support
- 24h down 8.5%
- Social heat drops 30%
- Expected pullback realized
- Observation period extended
ソーシャル・センチメント・インデックス(SSI)
- データ全体44SSI
- SSIトレンド(7日間)価格(7日間)センチメントの分布強気 (100%)SSIインサイトSKY social hot index is medium (44.06/100, -30.62%), activity sharply dropped 55.56% to 15.56, sentiment neutral, aligning with the break below 0.07 support and the 8.5% price pullback.
マーケット・パルス・ランキング(MPR)
- アラートインサイトSKY warning rank fell to #88 (down 9), social anomaly level dropped to 41.43/100 (down 44.64%), sentiment polarization remains stable, corresponding to the loss of support and price retracement.
Xへの投稿
Cyriptoman4 TA_Analyst Trader B27.93K @Cyriptoman4#SKY as expected the pullback came. 0,070 $ was the level I was watching. It fell below support. I will keep an eye on it for a while longer. https://t.co/BigBuzOHPm

58 1 1.36K オリジナル >リリース後のSKYのトレンド強気SKY pulled back below 0.070, and the author expects a significant rally after short-term consolidation.
slappjakke FA_Analyst Tokenomics_Expert C61.01K @Slappjakke
slappjakke FA_Analyst Tokenomics_Expert C61.01K @SlappjakkeWhen reviewing a DeFi protocol security should always be in mind. Moneymarkets are spending millions on audits, and have Risk Teams monitoring and reviewing collateral assets, but do you know who's first in line to absorb losses if funds are actually lost in the protocols you deploy your assets into? @sparkdotfi SparkLend breaks down the waterfall of loss absorption through 5 layers Layer 1: Prime Agent Risk Capital Spark eats its own losses first through internal treasury capital, then pulls in external junior money, and only after that touches the senior layer Layer 2: Surplus Buffer Protocol fees and liquidation revenue pile up here as a system-wide shock absorber Layer 3: Genesis Capital Backstop New layer (pending governance) where excess capital sitting idle across the Sky ecosystem gets tapped before SKY dilution kicks in Layer 4: Sky Token Backstop If everything above is depleted, the protocol mints SKY to recapitalize. Minting SKY is governance-controlled and designed for genuine tail scena
49 12 1.81K オリジナル >リリース後のSKYのトレンド強気SparkLend enhances protocol security and protects depositor funds through a five-layer loss absorption mechanism.
Eli5DeFi DeFi_Expert OnChain_Analyst C46.16K @Eli5defi
Eli5DeFi DeFi_Expert OnChain_Analyst C46.16K @Eli5defiSpark just published one of the clearer security frameworks in scaled DeFi. Not through vague “security” claims, but through a proper loss absorption waterfall. In simple terms: It explains how losses are absorbed before they reach user deposits across Spark Savings, SparkLend, and the Spark Liquidity Layer. That matters more after the latest wave of DeFi exploits. The recent KelpDAO rsETH exploit showed how one weak cross-chain component can spread stress across lending markets, trigger emergency freezes, and turn “isolated risk” into ecosystem-wide liquidity pressure. This is exactly why explicit risk design matters. Spark’s core idea is bounded capital movement → Explicit loss hierarchy → Programmatic liquidity coordination → Multi-oracle safeguards → Governance-constrained automation. In plain english: → Losses flow in order: prime agent capital, surplus buffer, genesis backstop, sky backstop, then final resolution → Only approved collateral; depegs can trigger emergency shutdown via special pri
38 19 2.96K オリジナル >リリース後のSKYのトレンド強気Spark has released a clear loss absorption framework aimed at protecting user deposits from DeFi risk.
Eli5DeFi DeFi_Expert OnChain_Analyst C46.16K @Eli5defi
Eli5DeFi DeFi_Expert OnChain_Analyst C46.16K @Eli5defiSpark just published one of the clearer security frameworks in scaled DeFi. Not through vague “security” claims, but through a proper loss absorption waterfall. In simple terms: It explains how losses are absorbed before they reach user deposits across Spark Savings, SparkLend, and the Spark Liquidity Layer. That matters more after the latest wave of DeFi exploits. The recent KelpDAO rsETH exploit showed how one weak cross-chain component can spread stress across lending markets, trigger emergency freezes, and turn “isolated risk” into ecosystem-wide liquidity pressure. This is exactly why explicit risk design matters. Spark’s core idea is bounded capital movement → Explicit loss hierarchy → Programmatic liquidity coordination → Multi-oracle safeguards → Governance-constrained automation. In plain english: → Losses flow in order: prime agent capital, surplus buffer, genesis backstop, sky backstop, then final resolution → Only approved collateral; depegs can trigger emergency shutdown via special pri
38 19 2.96K オリジナル >リリース後のSKYのトレンド非常に強気Spark releases a clear DeFi security framework to protect user funds.
slappjakke FA_Analyst Tokenomics_Expert C61.01K @SlappjakkeWhen reviewing a DeFi protocol security should always be in mind. Moneymarkets are spending millions on audits, and have Risk Teams monitoring and reviewing collateral assets, but do you know who's first in line to absorb losses if funds are actually lost in the protocols you deploy your assets into? @sparkdotfi SparkLend breaks down the waterfall of loss absorption through 5 layers Layer 1: Prime Agent Risk Capital Spark eats its own losses first through internal treasury capital, then pulls in external junior money, and only after that touches the senior layer Layer 2: Surplus Buffer Protocol fees and liquidation revenue pile up here as a system-wide shock absorber Layer 3: Genesis Capital Backstop New layer (pending governance) where excess capital sitting idle across the Sky ecosystem gets tapped before SKY dilution kicks in Layer 4: Sky Token Backstop If everything above is depleted, the protocol mints SKY to recapitalize. Minting SKY is governance-controlled and designed for genuine tail scena
49 12 1.81K オリジナル >リリース後のSKYのトレンド非常に強気SparkLend enhances protocol security and protects depositor funds through a five-layer loss absorption mechanism.
Eli5DeFi DeFi_Expert OnChain_Analyst C46.16K @Eli5defi
Eli5DeFi DeFi_Expert OnChain_Analyst C46.16K @Eli5defiSpark just published one of the clearer security frameworks in scaled DeFi. Not through vague “security” claims, but through a proper loss absorption waterfall. In simple terms: It explains how losses are absorbed before they reach user deposits across Spark Savings, SparkLend, and the Spark Liquidity Layer. That matters more after the latest wave of DeFi exploits. The recent KelpDAO rsETH exploit showed how one weak cross-chain component can spread stress across lending markets, trigger emergency freezes, and turn “isolated risk” into ecosystem-wide liquidity pressure. This is exactly why explicit risk design matters. Spark’s core idea is bounded capital movement → Explicit loss hierarchy → Programmatic liquidity coordination → Multi-oracle safeguards → Governance-constrained automation. In plain english: → Losses flow in order: prime agent capital, surplus buffer, genesis backstop, sky backstop, then final resolution → Only approved collateral; depegs can trigger emergency shutdown via special pri
38 19 2.96K オリジナル >リリース後のSKYのトレンド強気Spark releases a DeFi loss-absorption framework, protecting user deposits through multi-layer safeguards.
Eli5DeFi DeFi_Expert OnChain_Analyst C46.16K @Eli5defi
Eli5DeFi DeFi_Expert OnChain_Analyst C46.16K @Eli5defiSpark just published one of the clearer security frameworks in scaled DeFi. Not through vague “security” claims, but through a proper loss absorption waterfall. In simple terms: It explains how losses are absorbed before they reach user deposits across Spark Savings, SparkLend, and the Spark Liquidity Layer. That matters more after the latest wave of DeFi exploits. The recent KelpDAO rsETH exploit showed how one weak cross-chain component can spread stress across lending markets, trigger emergency freezes, and turn “isolated risk” into ecosystem-wide liquidity pressure. This is exactly why explicit risk design matters. Spark’s core idea is bounded capital movement → Explicit loss hierarchy → Programmatic liquidity coordination → Multi-oracle safeguards → Governance-constrained automation. In plain english: → Losses flow in order: prime agent capital, surplus buffer, genesis backstop, sky backstop, then final resolution → Only approved collateral; depegs can trigger emergency shutdown via special pri
38 19 2.96K オリジナル >リリース後のSKYのトレンド強気Spark released a clear DeFi security framework that protects user deposits through a multi-layer loss absorption mechanism.
Eli5DeFi DeFi_Expert OnChain_Analyst C46.16K @Eli5defiSpark just published one of the clearer security frameworks in scaled DeFi. Not through vague “security” claims, but through a proper loss absorption waterfall. In simple terms: It explains how losses are absorbed before they reach user deposits across Spark Savings, SparkLend, and the Spark Liquidity Layer. That matters more after the latest wave of DeFi exploits. The recent KelpDAO rsETH exploit showed how one weak cross-chain component can spread stress across lending markets, trigger emergency freezes, and turn “isolated risk” into ecosystem-wide liquidity pressure. This is exactly why explicit risk design matters. Spark’s core idea is bounded capital movement → Explicit loss hierarchy → Programmatic liquidity coordination → Multi-oracle safeguards → Governance-constrained automation. In plain english: → Losses flow in order: prime agent capital, surplus buffer, genesis backstop, sky backstop, then final resolution → Only approved collateral; depegs can trigger emergency shutdown via special pri

Spark D69.99K @sparkdotfiInside Spark’s loss absorption & risk frameworks. Spark’s security architecture is designed around: • bounded capital movement • explicit loss absorption layers • coordinated liquidity management • multi-layered oracle systems • constrained automation under governance-defined limits This deep dive breaks down how Spark structures risk, liquidity, and loss absorption across Spark Savings, SparkLend, and the Spark Liquidity Layer before losses propagate toward user deposits. Including: • updated loss absorption waterfall • Prime Agent risk capital • Genesis Capital Backstop • oracle and killswitch architecture • programmatic liquidity coordination • constrained allocation design under stress Security by design. Resilience by architecture. See what sits between losses and user deposits: https://t.co/JQrfSxMB4z
38 19 2.96K オリジナル >リリース後のSKYのトレンド非常に強気Spark has released a clear loss absorption framework aimed at protecting user deposits from DeFi risk.
吴说区块链 Media Educator D177.49K @wublockchain12Wu says he learned that, according to on-chain analyst余烬 monitoring, a suspected Dragonfly‑related address transferred 137 million SKY to Coinbase 10 minutes ago, worth about $9.05 million.余烬 stated that the SKY associated with this address likely originated from a conversion of MKR holdings moved from Binance in August 2021, which was worth about $20.45 million at the time; it has now shrunk by more than half, valued at about $9.05 million. https://t.co/3SE9T1jLit
1 2 2.17K オリジナル >リリース後のSKYのトレンド弱気SKY transferred to Coinbase, value shrank by more than half, indicating increased selling pressure.
Milk Road Influencer Educator D101.02K @MilkRoad
Kyle Reidhead | Milk Road Media Influencer C16.46K @KyleReidheadthe onchain finance protocols that focus on integrating the worlds best assets will perform the best overtime this is why $SKY and $HYPE are performing well during this “bear market” it’s why @USDai_Official had a great TGE too we’re building a new capital markets system onchain it’s value comes from servicing the best assets in the world which currently, are not digital assets
14 5 4.05K オリジナル >リリース後のSKYのトレンド強気SKY, HYPE and USDai are driven by on-chain asset integration, outlook positive
- データなし