RaveDAO (RAVE)

Relatively reliable $RAVE conspiracy theory brief summary: Huazi acts as a market maker for WLFI, learned in advance that the President is withdrawing funds from WLFI, and in early April on his own Dolomite platform, used WLFI to over-collateralize and borrow 75 million U (royal U, no one dares to seal). The money was not used to open ETH, but was entirely employed to manipulate $RAVE (the timing coincided right before RAVE launch). The project lead Felix Xu (徐野木) is a close associate of Huazi, and publicly claimed: “The recent pump has nothing to do with me, check as you like”. This is a blatant cover-up. Core logic: Huazi uses the more than 70 million U extracted from the final squeeze of WLFI to control $RAVE across multiple exchanges, completing WLFI's “final dance” — pumping the price, offloading, and attracting retail investors to take over. The final outcome: the President retreats, Sun (孙哥) fights for rights, Huazi sells tokens through a shell, everyone exits, leaving only Binance strongly pushing USD1 for the President to take over. (USD1 will not decouple despite WLFI price collapse, rest assured. Only the goodwill is damaged.) Thus $RAVE is the last manipulation wave Huazi conducted using WLFI cash-out funds, a pure major-player exit tool. Ignoring it entirely is the best choice; there is no circulating supply of this single-issue coin outside.

$RAVE - 1H TF 40% reaction so far from the first range of interest given yesterday. 👍 https://t.co/DMDvlp5Q9U

A $1.7M "Sell Intent" Just Spotted on $RAVE Two months ago, Wu Xiankun - a Cofounder of a Gaming project @The_Delysium received $RAVE tokens through an unlock or an airdrop. Total value at the time: ~$45,000 He just moved 131,750 of those tokens to Bitget as the $RAVE price begins to show signs of a correction with the current value of ~$1.7M. A 36x return on free tokens, deposited to exchange during the rally. The timing and destination make the intent fairly clear. This is what distribution looks like from the inside, and it's happening while the chart is still green

Look at this post, he shorted $RAVEUSDT at its peak, entry price $19 with 12x leverage, closed at $14.6 (about -22% from entry). Logically, a 12x short should be profitable, ROI could be +200‑300%+, but what happened? ROI was -3963.95%, causing the big player to lose until the collateral collapsed. How is that possible? The cause is a 100% funding rate. For those who don’t know, what is a funding rate? It’s used in trading perpetual futures (perp), which have no expiration date (unlike regular futures). To keep the perpetual price aligned with the spot price in the underlying market, the exchange provides a funding rate mechanism. This is like a “balancing fee” paid between long traders (buyers) and short traders (sellers) at each interval (normally every 8 hours). - Positive funding rate → Longs pay shorts. Usually occurs when the market is very bullish, and the perpetual price is higher than spot. The goal is to attract shorts so the perpetual price falls toward spot. - Negative funding rate → Shorts pay longs. Happens when the market is bearish/imbalanced, and the perpetual price is lower than spot. The goal is to attract longs so the perpetual price rises toward spot. In the recent $RAVE case, what made him lose was an extremely negative funding rate of up to -2%. And the funding interval was set to once per hour specifically for RAVEUSDT (instead of the usual 8‑hour interval for normal coins). What does that mean? Every hour, the shorter, like him, had to pay 2% of the position value to the longs. He shorted at $19 and the price fell to $14.7 (should have been profit). But he left the position open (didn't close), using cross margin, and got hit by multiple funding rounds. The cumulative funding fees ate up all the profit from the price drop. For a super‑volatile token like $RAVE (which just had a crazy pump + short squeeze), the funding rate can dominate far more than the price movement itself. So, in the future don’t just say “free short, easy money”; check the funding rate first.

thought $RAVE was cold... but it still has a 'breath' folks 👀 after a correction, price starts to recover slightly 📈 not strong enough yet but enough to pull back attention. now is it a technical bounce or rebuilding the trend? 🤔 this situation is not easy to predict folks don't rush all‑in.

Do you think $RAVE will crash from here? I think not Short positions are still strong Looks like they'll crush the shorts I rotated to a long position since yesterday. Are you going long or short on this? https://t.co/byXbc5993z

Two days ago it was a rally on rave, all altcoins rallied together, Binance life rave double‑headed dragon coordinated with several pump coins to rally. Now when A rallies, B sells to buy A, and there is a blood‑sucking effect between altcoins, which indicates it is not driven by a main force, but the main chips are not concentrated, and retail/whales keep speculating across several sectors. Those willing to add more money at this price and go all‑in are not market makers, but people who missed out on big gains in this swing, impatiently selling their “watermelons” when they see a rise and chasing others’ “sesames”. No one can avoid it; if I don’t make a single cent, I’ll be even more impatient than those people.

It's a good day playing with $RAVE on perps. Let's degen!

The $RAVE chart looked clean. The data tells a different story... I was checking the $RAVE chart. I opened @GeckoTerminal and I saw top 10 wallets holding 92% of supply 🤨 Also Bubblemaps confirmed multiple distribution wallets all linked I honestly don’t recommend trading tokens when the supply is that concentrated