Optimism (OP)

$0.1203  -5.05%  24H

ソーシャル・センチメント・インデックス（SSI）

マーケット・パルス・ランキング（MPR）

Xへの投稿

  • kimcĦi.ℏ/acc Media Educator B
     3.99K  @HederaKimchi
    64비트사령부⚡️ D
     4.40K  @64bitcoinkr

    Coins from the U.S. to watch if the CLARITY bill passes https://t.co/ohgCaY4zEI

     129  26  14.90K
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のOPのトレンド
     強気
    The CLARITY bill has passed; focus on coins that may benefit from U.S. policy.
  • Jonathan Carter Technical Analyst Trader A
     9.04K  @JohncyCrypto

    #OP Channel Support Holding Strong👨‍💻 Optimism is maintaining its position above the lower border of the descending channel on the 3D chart🔍 ✅ Bulls taking control at a key zone ✅ Volume starting to climb ✅ Channel structure intact Price targets: $0.20 → $0.34 → $0.47 → $0.87 → $1.34 → $2.50🎯 Momentum is shifting here✈️

     7  1  754
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のOPのトレンド
     非常に強気
    OP has strong support at the bottom of the descending channel, bulls are in control, and the price is expected to rebound to $2.50.
  • Crypto Patel TA_Analyst Influencer B
     54.66K  @CryptoPatel

    $OP: Ethereum’s Superchain Infrastructure | Crashed 97% | 4,000% Upside Potential #OP was Trading Inside A Multi-Year Descending Channel On The Weekly Chart Since The Cycle High Near $5. After A -97.76% Correction, Price Currently Trading around $0.12 & This is Key Accumulation Zone Showing Early Demand Absorption. A Weekly Bearish Divergence Marked The Macro Top, Followed By A Structural Breakdown And Bearish Retest Rejection, Confirming Downtrend Continuation. What Is Optimism? Optimism Is A Leading Ethereum Layer-2 Infrastructure Powering The Superchain Ecosystem, 34+ Chains Handling 50%+ Of L2 Activity. Backed By $425M+ From a16z And Paradigm With Current Market Cap Around ~$270M. Current Technical Structure ✅ Descending Channel Resistance From ATH $5 ✅ -97.76% Sell-Side Liquidity Sweep Near to Completed ✅ HTF Demand Zone $0.075–$0.13 Holding ✅ Weekly Volatility Compression (Expansion Setup) ✅ Strong Bullish Confirmation: Weekly Close Above $0.3764 Why $3–$5 Is Possible? ➤ 50%+ L2 Market Dominance (OP Stack) ➤ $6.3B Ecosystem TVL ➤ 3.6B Transactions In H2 2025 (ATH) ➤ $425M+ VC Backing ➤ OP Buyback Program Active (50% Revenue) ➤ ZK Integration + Interop Layer Coming 2026 ➤ Institutional Chains: Kraken, Sony, OKX CryptoPatel Targets: $0.37/$0.85/$2/$5 Projected ROI: 4,068% From Accumulation Zone To Full Extension At $5 Invalidation: Weekly Close Below $0.075 ⚠️ Risks: Token Unlock Pressure | Competition From ARB / zkSync | Revenue Concentration | Open Source Fork Risk HTF Patience Based Setup. Spot Accumulation Only. Asymmetric R:R At -97% Drawdown On The Most Adopted L2 Infrastructure In Crypto With Active Buybacks And $425M+ Institutional Backing. TA Only. Not Financial Advice. Always DYOR. @Optimism

     236  22  8.91K
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のOPのトレンド
     非常に強気
    After a 97% decline, OP is seen as a high-potential accumulation zone, target price $5.
  • $0uL TA_Analyst Trader A
     34.10K  @spetsnaz_3

    $OP will go down as one of my worst investments this bull run, even after buying at 90% drawdown it went 80% more cause @base decided to back off! welcome to trading. https://t.co/HOCHu3EH4P

    $0uL TA_Analyst Trader A
     34.10K  @spetsnaz_3

    $OP aka @Optimism is one of the best altcoin opportunities imo and it's currently at its lowest levels in months. built to scale #Ethereum, it powers @base and brings millions onchain with near zero fees. Bullish on ETH? Bullish on Base? then you have to be bullish on $OP. we will come back to this post in a few weeks/days...

     230  8  16.68K
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のOPのトレンド
     強気
    Although the author has incurred an 81% loss, they remain bullish on OP as the core potential for ETH and Base L2, considering it a good buying opportunity.
  • 吴说区块链 Media Researcher D
     171.57K  @wublockchain12

    Wu said he learned that Optimism announced it will cease support for op-geth and op-program on May 31, 2026; prior to that, security patches and critical vulnerability fixes will continue to be provided, but new feature development, including the next Karst hard fork, will be conducted only on op-reth. Meanwhile, the fault proof program of op-program will be migrated to kona-client, and the current deployment is expected to remain usable until the Karst hard fork. https://t.co/yaLPPSoJH7

     1  1  1.84K
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のOPのトレンド
     中立
    Optimism will discontinue op-geth, and subsequent new features will be developed only on op-reth and kona-client.
  • TapTools OnChain_Analyst Media B
     71.95K  @TapTools

    Hey @grok, which of these assets stands to benefit the most once the CLARITY Act passes? https://t.co/Of9UZ7QR4S

     417  44  57.41K
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のOPのトレンド
     強気
    The image analyzes which crypto assets are likely to become the 'big winners' of US crypto policy (such as the CLARITY Act).
  • Tanaka DeFi_Expert FA_Analyst A
     41.54K  @Tanaka_L2

    Just checked some info about @Optimism, one thing that keeps catching my attention is Optimism’s strange position in the market. OP Stack is powering a huge part of the rollup ecosystem today. But when I look closer, the chain that built the rails might not be the one capturing the most value. Here’s how I currently see the situation around Optimism | $OP 👇

    Tanaka DeFi_Expert FA_Analyst A
     41.54K  @Tanaka_L2

    1/ OP Stack has become one of the most widely adopted rollup infrastructures After the Bedrock upgrade, the architecture became much closer to Ethereum itself. Tooling works smoothly and infra teams already know how to run it without friction. Launching a new chain became almost plug-and-play. That’s why major players pulled the trigger quickly: – @base (Coinbase) – @unichain (Uniswap) – @soneium (Sony) – @inkonchain (Kraken) – @worldcoinfnd From an infra perspective, OP Stack is clearly winning adoption.

    Tanaka DeFi_Expert FA_Analyst A
     41.54K  @Tanaka_L2

    2/ But the actual users and liquidity are not on OP Mainnet When I compare the data, the gap is pretty obvious. @Base currently holds: – ~$3.9B TVL – ~$4.7B in stablecoins – ~10M+ daily transactions Meanwhile OP Mainnet sits around: – ~$218M TVL – ~$538M stablecoins So while the stack is widely used, the center of gravity has shifted toward Base.

    Tanaka DeFi_Expert FA_Analyst A
     41.54K  @Tanaka_L2

    3/ Superchain economic model is starting to show cracks The original idea was simple. Superchain members would contribute something like: – ~2.5% of revenue – or ~15% of profit back to the Optimism Collective. That revenue flow was expected to support ecosystem funding and even $OP buybacks. But then Base signaled they want to move away from that structure and roll their own stack. Since Base is generating massive sequencer revenue, losing that contribution hits the Superchain narrative pretty hard.

    Tanaka DeFi_Expert FA_Analyst A
     41.54K  @Tanaka_L2

    4/ Distribution might be the real moat in L2 After watching Base grow, I keep coming back to one thought. Base didn’t win because of better technology. Coinbase already controls a massive distribution layer: – a global exchange – millions of wallet users – fiat onramps – a direct pipeline of retail liquidity They effectively turned that distribution into an L2 user acquisition engine.

    Tanaka DeFi_Expert FA_Analyst A
     41.54K  @Tanaka_L2

    5/ This feels like a classic open-source infra trap Build great rails, everyone adopts them. But the biggest players capture the economic value. We’ve seen similar dynamics before with: – Linux infrastructure – AWS customers building internal systems – even Ethereum vs some L2s. The technology spreads everywhere, but value capture becomes fragmented.

    Tanaka DeFi_Expert FA_Analyst A
     41.54K  @Tanaka_L2

    6/ OP Stack ecosystem is still strong To be fair, the OP Stack ecosystem still dominates a large share of L2 blockspace. – Mantle: $765.16M TVL, $876M stables, 0.5 UOPS – Ink: $460.9M TVL, $493.2M stables, 7.2 UOPS – Celo: $25.5M TVL, $158M stables, 20 UOPS – Unichain: $49.27M TVL, $174.5M stables, 10.8 UOPS – BOB: $55.83M TVL, $20.5M stables, 0.06 UOPS are all running on the stack and contributing activity. So the infrastructure layer remains extremely relevant.

    Tanaka DeFi_Expert FA_Analyst A
     41.54K  @Tanaka_L2

    7/ The real question now is value accrual for $OP From my perspective, the Superchain thesis depends heavily on: – native cross-chain liquidity. – seamless composability between OP chains. If Optimism can ship strong interoperability fast enough, the ecosystem might still lock in long-term value. If not, large players could continue forking the stack and keeping the economics for themselves. Base already showed that path. I’m still bullish on the infrastructure Optimism built. The tech clearly works. But when I evaluate $OP as an investment narrative, the big question I keep asking is simple: What exactly does owning $OP give exposure to in the long run?

     28  7  895
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のOPのトレンド
     弱気
    Although the OP Stack technology is successful, the value capture of the OP token is questionable, and Base's rise weakens the Superchain economic model.
  • 0xzhaozhao | 🌊Web3浪客 | MemeMax⚡️ Influencer Educator B
     71.59K  @0xzhaozhao
    链上达人 D
     114.14K  @wenxue600

    The OPN community is organizing a protest WeChat group, DC launched simultaneously, and also created a shared form Although it's hard to influence the allocation result, still support such actions 🫡 Sometimes the community being too easygoing is not a good thing, it only makes the project forget the respect it should have for the community

     87  50  24.36K
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のOPのトレンド
     非常に弱気
    OPN community is organizing a protest over OP token allocation issues, sentiment extremely negative.
  • C J Quant Trader A
     21.94K  @gch_enbsbxbs

    I am working on prediction markets and have not considered doing OP on this exchange. One side is that the progress is a bit behind schedule. The other is that this exchange belongs to the type of project that starts a death countdown as soon as the token is issued, making it impossible to do long‑term. (Regarding this view, friends, no need to argue with me). I don't want to spend effort writing a script, only to have it wasted after a few days. Just like when I wrote perp, points were actually secondary. This thing can still generate passive income even if the market is poor. (I have calculated that arbitrage earnings exceed point earnings.) Spending money to earn points is inherently abnormal. If a strategy cannot be profitable, it's no different from gambling. Moreover, prediction market scripts differ from perp. Integrating a new exchange is much more difficult than perp because there are many event types and no standardization. (If it were perp using the same strategy, integrating a new exchange would only take about 2 hours.) It is time‑consuming and labor‑intensive, and if you still cannot earn deterministic, long‑term stable money, then it really isn’t worth it.

     41  13  9.53K
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のOPのトレンド
     非常に弱気
    The OP project lacks long-term value, recommend avoiding it.
  • Gun (Kingbund) Educator Community_Lead B
     4.01K  @KingBund
    Gun (Kingbund) Educator Community_Lead B
     4.01K  @KingBund

    Optimism put almost all its eggs in one basket. And got punished. If BASE exits, Optimism could lose 95%+ of its chain revenue. Big concentration risk! Brutal lesson for OP and for every crypto project watching. Simple Lesson Never build your business around one whale. Diversify revenue. Always. . From BASE’s side, it makes sense. Once you’re big enough, why keep paying fees? Better to spend money upfront, build your own stack, and lower costs long term. . A bigger question is : So what's the point of Layer 2s? They seems to be just stepping stones, until teams are big enough to leave?

     2  0  375
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のOPのトレンド
     非常に弱気
    Optimism faces massive revenue loss if Base exits, highlighting L2 concentration risk.