Injective Protocol (INJ)

$4.827  +5.37%  24H

ソーシャル・センチメント・インデックス（SSI）

マーケット・パルス・ランキング（MPR）

Xへの投稿

  • IKAY 🥷👷‍♂️🔥 Tokenomics_Expert Community_Lead B
     2.72K  @Great_Ikay
    IKAY 🥷👷‍♂️🔥 Tokenomics_Expert Community_Lead B
     2.72K  @Great_Ikay

    BREAKING: $INJ has climbed to 5th place in 7-day blockchain netflows, surpassing $BTC, $SOL, $SUI, and $BNB, etc. Anon study, Injective https://t.co/imvcrl2SPw

     3  0  55
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のINJのトレンド
     強気
    INJ has risen to fifth place in the 7‑day on‑chain net inflow ranking, surpassing mainstream coins such as BTC and SOL.
  • IKAY 🥷👷‍♂️🔥 Tokenomics_Expert Community_Lead B
     2.72K  @Great_Ikay

    BREAKING: $INJ has climbed to 5th place in 7-day blockchain netflows, surpassing $BTC, $SOL, $SUI, and $BNB, etc. Anon study, Injective https://t.co/imvcrl2SPw

     3  0  55
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のINJのトレンド
     非常に強気
    INJ has risen to fifth place in the 7‑day on‑chain net inflow ranking, surpassing mainstream coins such as BTC and SOL.
  • Web3 Princess 👑 FA_Analyst DeFi_Expert B
     16.83K  @BrianneFrey

    In 2026, proof of work is your resume. The @Injective Ambassador Program is open to all To up your chances of acceptance, you must show value. For me, that meant education. 🥷 Deep dive guides 🥷 Simplify the tech 🥷 Highlight the ecosystem Build up your reputation first. https://t.co/hmgDNuHMo9

    覚悟 𝐇𝐄𝐈𝐒𝐄𝐍𝐁𝐄𝐑𝐆 D
     2.36K  @mrwhitecooks

    https://t.co/E4tpDWBFeU

     8  4  161
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のINJのトレンド
     強気
    The Injective Ambassador Program is open for applications, encouraging you to contribute value through education to increase your chances of being selected.
  • Cointelegraph Media Influencer C
     2.90M  @Cointelegraph

    📊 MARKET: $INJ TVL is up 40% MoM and 64% up in 2026. Source: https://t.co/Anb6DJiPmh Stake INJ: https://t.co/PwfgsfiIDp https://t.co/IJ4kErbvxO

     109  37  14.65K
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のINJのトレンド
     非常に強気
    INJ TVL has increased by nearly 40% in 30 days, showing strong momentum.
  • 0xztiRoV Dev Derivatives_Expert B
     1.92K  @0xztirov

    Few appreciate how ridiculous it still is in 2026 trying to duct tape perps together on generic L2s when Injective EVM exists right there Solidity friendly, native orderbook, zero bridge nonsense, battle tested validators. Mental how people still choose the pain

    Prerada.eth D
     477  @HOLSTON20121

    Stop taping perps together on generic L2s. Injective EVM is right there, Solidity-friendly, native orderbook, zero-bridge hassle, validators are hardcore. Jumping back and forth on bridges in 2026 is truly lagging.

     11  6  46
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のINJのトレンド
     強気
    Injective EVM native orderbook, zero-bridge, Solidity-friendly, worth using in 2026
  • Crypto Winkle OnChain_Analyst Media B
     22.84K  @CryptoWinkle
    marilyn100x.eth OnChain_Analyst Educator A
     8.99K  @marilyn100x

    Injective has a ongoing governance proposal that expects to reduce inj supply and make it more deflationary What actually burns @injective? Injective uses real, onchain ecosystem revenue to buy and burn $INJ. From historical onchain data: > Total buyback value so far: ~$37M > INJ burned via buybacks: ~6.87M INJ Recent cadence (historical average): > ~8,500 INJ burned per week > ~34,000 INJ per month > ~400,000 INJ per year(Buybacks scale with ecosystem revenue, they are not fixed or guaranteed.) What the proposal does: > Further reduces issuance > Keeps buybacks active Assuming buyback revenue remains at current levels, the reduced issuance implies: > Net deflation rate approximately doubles relative to the current framework A flat-activity estimate: ~800,000 INJ net removed per year(assuming no ecosystem growth and no change in buyback behavior) Why this compounds: > Each year, the same burn removes a larger % of total supply > Deflation strengthens without requiring larger absolute burns Scenario o

     62  5  1.32K
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のINJのトレンド
     非常に強気
    The Injective proposal will double the deflation rate of the INJ token, providing a long-term positive impact on the token's value.
  • marilyn100x.eth OnChain_Analyst Educator A
     8.99K  @marilyn100x

    Injective has a ongoing governance proposal that expects to reduce inj supply and make it more deflationary What actually burns @injective? Injective uses real, onchain ecosystem revenue to buy and burn $INJ. From historical onchain data: > Total buyback value so far: ~$37M > INJ burned via buybacks: ~6.87M INJ Recent cadence (historical average): > ~8,500 INJ burned per week > ~34,000 INJ per month > ~400,000 INJ per year(Buybacks scale with ecosystem revenue, they are not fixed or guaranteed.) What the proposal does: > Further reduces issuance > Keeps buybacks active Assuming buyback revenue remains at current levels, the reduced issuance implies: > Net deflation rate approximately doubles relative to the current framework A flat-activity estimate: ~800,000 INJ net removed per year(assuming no ecosystem growth and no change in buyback behavior) Why this compounds: > Each year, the same burn removes a larger % of total supply > Deflation strengthens without requiring larger absolute burns Scenario o

     62  5  1.32K
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のINJのトレンド
     非常に強気
    The Injective proposal will double the deflation rate of the INJ token, providing a long-term positive impact on the token's value.
  • IKAY 🥷👷‍♂️🔥 Tokenomics_Expert Community_Lead B
     2.72K  @Great_Ikay
    IKAY 🥷👷‍♂️🔥 Tokenomics_Expert Community_Lead B
     2.72K  @Great_Ikay

    $INJ vs. $SOL: Network Performance (2026) Throughput: Injective scales to 25,000 TPS, well ahead of Solana’s ~1,500 TPS Costs: Injective fees stay below $0.01, while Solana operates at $0.00025 per transaction Speed: Injective finalizes blocks in 0.65 sec versus Solana’s 0.4 sec https://t.co/13OrP4bfru

     105  14  3.86K
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のINJのトレンド
     強気
    The tweet compares INJ and SOL network performance in 2026, highlighting INJ's significantly higher throughput.
  • IKAY 🥷👷‍♂️🔥 Tokenomics_Expert Community_Lead B
     2.72K  @Great_Ikay
    IKAY 🥷👷‍♂️🔥 Tokenomics_Expert Community_Lead B
     2.72K  @Great_Ikay

    $INJ vs. $SOL: Network Performance (2026) Throughput: Injective scales to 25,000 TPS, well ahead of Solana’s ~1,500 TPS Costs: Injective fees stay below $0.01, while Solana operates at $0.00025 per transaction Speed: Injective finalizes blocks in 0.65 sec versus Solana’s 0.4 sec https://t.co/13OrP4bfru

     105  14  3.86K
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のINJのトレンド
     中立
    The tweet compares INJ and SOL network performance in 2026, noting INJ's higher throughput while SOL has cost and speed advantages.
  • IKAY 🥷👷‍♂️🔥 Tokenomics_Expert Community_Lead B
     2.72K  @Great_Ikay

    $INJ vs. $SOL: Network Performance (2026) Throughput: Injective scales to 25,000 TPS, well ahead of Solana’s ~1,500 TPS Costs: Injective fees stay below $0.01, while Solana operates at $0.00025 per transaction Speed: Injective finalizes blocks in 0.65 sec versus Solana’s 0.4 sec https://t.co/13OrP4bfru

     105  14  3.86K
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のINJのトレンド
     中立
    The tweet compares INJ and SOL network performance in 2026, highlighting INJ's significantly higher throughput.