DAR Open Network (D)

saga's stable yield architecture reveals structural inefficiencies across defi that nobody's arbitraging

75% APR on MUST/D stable-to-stable pairs
69% on MUST/USDC
36% on D/USD

these aren't promotional rates, they're sustained by actual protocol mechanics

the delta between saga's stable yields and base-layer lending (aave 5%, compound 4%) represents either mispricing or unrecognized risk. likely both

what's actually generating returns:
> CDP borrowing demand creates negative real rates for borrowers who pay to access leverage.
> liquidity routing fees from swap aggregation.
> automated rebalancing capturing spread.
> real credit market dynamics onchain

$D and $MUST are collateralized mechanisms designed for composability within saga's stack. the stable-to-stable pairing eliminates impermanent loss while capturing yield from orthogonal sources, borrowing fees not trading volume

this is fundamentally different from curve's model where stable yields come from CRV emissions (declining) or convex flywheel (ex

Wu said he learned that Binance announced it will cease supporting deposits and withdrawals for the specified tokens on the following networks as of January 16 at 16:00. After that, deposits of the specified tokens on these networks will not be credited to accounts and may result in asset loss. This includes: Dar Open Network (D) on the Ethereum Network, and Streamr (DATA) on the BNB Smart Chain and Polygon Network.
https://t.co/o2yA9AWWuL