BNB (BNB)

For the first time in my life I feel a trace of shame when I tell someone I’m involved in crypto. Not because the charts look bad at the moment or because the market cap is bleeding, but because the narrative that once carried us has thinned out into something I can no longer defend with the same conviction. It feels like we lost the moral high ground without even noticing the exact moment it slipped through our fingers. What used to be a discussion about sovereignty, censorship resistance and the re-architecture of trust has been flattened into a theatre of extraction, where the loudest voices no longer articulate vision but liquidity. The worst part is that we are now also entangled in the web of the most corrupt forces from the fiat world, and many, very many OGs and well known names in crypto are partners or donors to these corrupt structures. Well, again: the unsettling part is not the volatility, it is the erosion of meaning. I built my certainty on the assumption that beneath the noise there wou

For the first time in my life I feel a trace of shame when I tell someone I’m involved in crypto. Not because the charts look bad at the moment or because the market cap is bleeding, but because the narrative that once carried us has thinned out into something I can no longer defend with the same conviction. It feels like we lost the moral high ground without even noticing the exact moment it slipped through our fingers. What used to be a discussion about sovereignty, censorship resistance and the re-architecture of trust has been flattened into a theatre of extraction, where the loudest voices no longer articulate vision but liquidity. The worst part is that we are now also entangled in the web of the most corrupt forces from the fiat world, and many, very many OGs and well known names in crypto are partners or donors to these corrupt structures. Well, again: the unsettling part is not the volatility, it is the erosion of meaning. I built my certainty on the assumption that beneath the noise there wou

Spotted on CZ @cz_binance at Mar-a-Lago CZ now assumes himself is more of an advocate for the industry @worldlibertyfi #USD1 @ZachWitkoff @BNBCHAIN @binancezh https://t.co/hGJ5SroUvf

$BNB is moving nicely along its bullish trendline. It looks simple, but honestly that's enough for a quick long setup in my book. Let's see how this plays out. https://t.co/3LaO275dls

Today I came across the set of screenshots from 嗯哼, and many people said they were fake. But in my view, they are very likely real. It's not because of the chat content itself, but because of the final sentence: “我越界了” That sentence is too genuine. I guess it truly reflects on the problem. Actually, as early as the end of 2023, I was sharing dual‑token financial products on Weibo, 嗯哼 DM'ed me saying: Many people in the group were very interested in my strategy, and wanted to invite me to their group to share. My first feeling then was: it was a bit overstepping. We are not familiar, and have no trust foundation, but they directly wanted me to share in their private domain. So I chose: read without replying. In 2024, Liberty Cats entered an explosive phase, and the community heat was very high. 嗯哼 again added me on WeChat via Jiumei, saying he wanted to help promote the project. I still declined. On one hand, it was the impression from the previous time. On the other hand, Since day one, Liberty Cats has never taken a KOL promotion route. All dissemination, is done spontaneously by the community. During that period, Coins rose, cats rose, and many people made money along. There were also quite a few KOLs who were jealous and came to trample. For example, the Weibo user “Da Xi Ha”, who continuously insulted me and the project for half a year. Later he himself was exposed by people around him for problems, and gradually disappeared. This incident made me more certain of a judgment: For people who inexplicably attack you online, there’s actually no need to respond. (Most are just jealous or want to ride the traffic) But people with unstable foundations, time will filter them out for you. Later I moved to Twitter, There was a post where I shared the dual‑token earnings on OKX, which was retweeted by 嗯哼, The gist was slightly mocking: That the same money yields higher returns on Binance. These actually don’t matter. But the real issue lies in: It’s not about stance, but about boundaries. People of the level of He Yi and CZ, can be compatible downwards, can add WeChat, can communicate. But that doesn’t mean: boundaries can be ignored. Creating those short videos that hype Binance and disparage OKX, essentially isn’t interaction, but rather injects one’s private‑domain traffic anxiety, into the platform relationship. If you just silently delete it, the issue might just pass. But going to find He Yi in the middle of the night to explain, and even trying to discuss stance, that becomes: projecting your own problems onto the other party. Thus later comes the sentence: “I crossed the line.” Many problems aren’t formed in a day. But rather over the long term: strong purpose, weak sense of boundaries, excessive socializing the result of gradual accumulation. 嗯哼 is still young. If he truly realizes this, it’s actually a good thing. Money was earned, traffic was also experienced, What’s more important next is not to keep expanding outward, but to steady oneself, reduce ineffective socializing and guard the achievements already obtained, which is more important.