Injective Protocol (INJ)

https://t.co/E4tpDWBFeU

Stop taping perps together on generic L2s. Injective EVM is right there, Solidity-friendly, native orderbook, zero-bridge hassle, validators are hardcore. Jumping back and forth on bridges in 2026 is truly lagging.

Injective has a ongoing governance proposal that expects to reduce inj supply and make it more deflationary What actually burns @injective? Injective uses real, onchain ecosystem revenue to buy and burn $INJ. From historical onchain data: > Total buyback value so far: ~$37M > INJ burned via buybacks: ~6.87M INJ Recent cadence (historical average): > ~8,500 INJ burned per week > ~34,000 INJ per month > ~400,000 INJ per year(Buybacks scale with ecosystem revenue, they are not fixed or guaranteed.) What the proposal does: > Further reduces issuance > Keeps buybacks active Assuming buyback revenue remains at current levels, the reduced issuance implies: > Net deflation rate approximately doubles relative to the current framework A flat-activity estimate: ~800,000 INJ net removed per year(assuming no ecosystem growth and no change in buyback behavior) Why this compounds: > Each year, the same burn removes a larger % of total supply > Deflation strengthens without requiring larger absolute burns Scenario o

$INJ vs. $SOL: Network Performance (2026) Throughput: Injective scales to 25,000 TPS, well ahead of Solana’s ~1,500 TPS Costs: Injective fees stay below $0.01, while Solana operates at $0.00025 per transaction Speed: Injective finalizes blocks in 0.65 sec versus Solana’s 0.4 sec https://t.co/13OrP4bfru

$INJ vs. $SOL: Network Performance (2026) Throughput: Injective scales to 25,000 TPS, well ahead of Solana’s ~1,500 TPS Costs: Injective fees stay below $0.01, while Solana operates at $0.00025 per transaction Speed: Injective finalizes blocks in 0.65 sec versus Solana’s 0.4 sec https://t.co/13OrP4bfru

A social experiment begins on @Injective. Injective Compounding Experiment (ICE) Starting with a donated NFT, Hell Punks, with an approximate 0.06 $INJ floor, and attempting to trade up over time. Starting NFT: https://t.co/cVmMnQhikf ICE tests whether disciplined and transparent actions, starting from a weak NFT position, can compound into something stronger over time without relying on added capital, and whether NFTs still function as meaningful on chain exchange assets. Trackable on https://t.co/STxcVBh8sZ inj1c6pg4qt0977ggwty6hgze2phk7cy03wfzdlvlp

IIP-617 introduces a structural upgrade to $INJ tokenomics, permanently accelerating total supply reduction. This overview explains the proposal and its impact on Injective going forward. IIP-617 Summary This proposal seeks to advance INJ into a new deflationary phase by permanently increasing the rate of total supply reduction. The updated INJ framework reinforces deflation as a defining property of INJ. Once implemented onchain, the changes are expected to double the rate of INJ deflation, increasing deflation by a factor of 100%. When combined with the existing Injective Community BuyBack, which systematically removes INJ from circulation, Injective's tokenomics design shifts toward a structurally enhanced deflationary model. Reduced issuance and recurring token burns operate in tandem to strengthen long term supply contraction, positioning INJ among the most deflationary assets in the crypto ecosystem. Introduction INJ is the core asset securing the Injective network and coordinating economic activi