Arbitrum (ARB)

$0.1930  0%  24H

Índice de sentimiento social (ISS)

Clasificación del pulso del mercado (CPM)

Publicaciones de X

  • Smart Drop Farmer OnChain_Analyst DeFi_Expert A
     2.50K  @SmartDropFarmer

    Perp DEX points & OTC floors Not estimates. These are actual recent prices where points have traded in OTC groups. Volume is still low, so don’t take it as gospel just good reference for the meta. 🔹Variational → Arbitrum - raised $11.8M → Market structure infrastructure angle → OTC floor: $5 per point 🔹Extended → Starknet - raised $6.5M → Starknet native perp venue → OTC floor: $2.40 per point 🔹GRVT → zkSync - Early Access - raised $33.3M → High-capital zk perp venue → OTC floor: $15 per point 🔹 edgeX → StarkWare zk-rollup — Mainnet → ZK execution + perp infra → OTC floor: $25 per point 🔹Paradex → Starknet - Mainnet - raised $35M → ZK perps backed by Starkware stack → OTC floor: $0.18 per point 🔹 Pacifica → Solana, future L1 → Solana-native perp DEX → OTC floor: $0.25 per point 🔹Backpack → Hybrid Cex - Solana - raised $37M → Orderbook CEX + Solana infra expansion → OTC floor: $0.19 per point 🔹Reya → Arbitrum + own L2 infra → Liquidity infra + perp market structure → OTC floor: $0.02 per point 🔹 Ethereal → Perp Infra, backed by Ethena → OTC floor: $0.01 per point There are 30+ perp DEXes live or in testnet TODAY, farming meta is fragmented but very alive. OTC volumes are still low, so these prices don’t define true VALUATIONS, just useful to track how private markets are marking these ecosystems. > Now, are these prices cheap? It depends. For several of these protocols, community expectations and private estimates imply much higher valuations per point. OTC just gives you actual clearing prices where transactions happened but keep in mind that: - volume = low - participants = limited - pricing = not final Still, it’s one of the few places where you can see real bids/asks instead of pure narratives. I’ll try to update this every once in a while so we can track if OTC floors go up or down as we get closer to token events. Bookmark for later. 📌

     2  2  90
    Original >
    Tendencia de ARB tras el lanzamiento
     Neutral
    Perp DEX points' OTC price has been disclosed, but volume is low and not a final valuation, for reference tracking only.
  • DeFi Warhol FA_Analyst OnChain_Analyst B
     35.21K  @Defi_Warhol
    DeFi Warhol FA_Analyst OnChain_Analyst B
     35.21K  @Defi_Warhol

    Full Arbitrum Ecosystem Landscape: DeFi, RWAs, Perps, and Consumer Apps Lending: - @aavve - @Morpho - @0xfluid - @compoundfinance - @Dolomite_io - @eulerfinance - @SiloFinance Yield: - @Pendle_fi - @sparkdotfi - @magpiexyz_io - @AuraFinance - @ConvexFinance - @beefyfinance DEXs: - @Uniswap - @0xfluid - @PancakeSwap - @0xtristero - @CamelotDEX - @native_fi - @CurveFinance - @NablaFi RWA: - @spiko_finance - @PleasingGolden - @MidasRWA - @Theo_Network - @Securitize - @DinariGlobal - @EstateProtocol Perps: - @etherealdex - @GMX_IO - @OstiumLabs - @Variational_io - @Rho_Labs - @Aark_Digital Consumer: - @BleapApp - @Fiat24Official - @AviciMoney - @PeanutProtocol - @holyheld - @0xSplits What did I miss? Hope you enjoyed this post and found some new VALUABLE information. If you wanna support me, I'd appreciate a like, reply, bookmark, and RT <3

     227  49  12.64K
    Original >
    Tendencia de ARB tras el lanzamiento
     Neutral
    Comprehensively showcase DeFi, RWA, Perps, and consumer application projects within the Arbitrum ecosystem.
  • MobΞth Researcher Tokenomics_Expert B
     3.73K  @MobWeth
    Arbitrum Japan D
     3.57K  @Arbitrum_jpn

    Thank you very much to everyone who participated in yesterday's event at the University of Tokyo! 🙏 We are delighted that we were able to have many wonderful discussions about Arbitrum's digital sovereign economy. Especially the interactions with those who were interested in the ambassador program were impressive, and we are very excited about the future. We also sincerely thank the @UTokyo_News team for providing such a valuable opportunity.

     32  2  12.99K
    Original >
    Tendencia de ARB tras el lanzamiento
     Alcista
    Arbitrum successfully held an event at the University of Tokyo, actively promoting the ambassador program.
  • nzt OnChain_Analyst DeFi_Expert B
     1.37K  @nazarius_amb
    nzt OnChain_Analyst DeFi_Expert B
     1.37K  @nazarius_amb

    2022–2024 - arbitrum - layerzero - starknet - and many other projects when you were watching retrodrop guides during those years, most of them focused on how to make more transactions, how to interact with as many contracts as possible, and how to make the whole process cheaper now this approach may not work with two of the main retrodrop contenders 2025-2026 - opensea - base - polymarket - dex - pm it’s unclear whether there will be a good airdrop, and there is a real possibility of losing more than you can earn so the first rule is that you should make money, not lose it and fortunately, this is not that hard to implement. if we take base as an example, there are tons of tokens and plenty of ecosystem projects available the same goes for opensea: when doing swaps, you can simply swap eth/usdc and lose money on fees, or you can actually earn by trading other tokens but a certain portion of people will lose more than just fees, so a smart approach is required here i think you got the main idea: don

     5  5  115
    Original >
    Tendencia de ARB tras el lanzamiento
     Bajista
    Be cautious of retrodrops such as Base and OpenSea in 2025‑2026, avoid losing money on fees.
  • P|.edge🦭 DeFi_Expert OnChain_Analyst B
     2.32K  @eth2828

    If fees flip from rent to coordination, baskets could become the real on-chain ETF primitive. This experiment might be bigger than it looks.

    Thư🌊 D
     14.27K  @Ng_AThu9899

    gn. the missing piece with on-chain ETFs wasn’t UX, it was committing bqsket rules to conwensus. @helios_layer1 treats baskets as state, not apps. my test plan this week: 1) Forge a majors+stables basket on Arbitrum, 2) let Chronos handle rebalances, 3) migrate execution via Hyperion and stake the basket in IPOSR. if the 90% revenue burn + halvinb actually holds, fees become a coordination tool, not a rent. that’s the experiment i want to see play out

     7  0  28
    Original >
    Tendencia de ARB tras el lanzamiento
     Alcista
    The tweet discusses the huge potential of on-chain ETF primitives and plans a basket experiment on Arbitrum.
  • 𝗵𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿 Community_Lead Media B
     15.69K  @BFreshHB

    gm @arbitrum fam https://t.co/NG1aQZCvMZ

     95  46  1.80K
    Original >
    Tendencia de ARB tras el lanzamiento
     Neutral
    The tweet greets the Arbitrum community, and the image shows support for the project.
  • DeFi Warhol FA_Analyst OnChain_Analyst B
     35.21K  @Defi_Warhol

    Full Arbitrum Ecosystem Landscape: DeFi, RWAs, Perps, and Consumer Apps Lending: - @aavve - @Morpho - @0xfluid - @compoundfinance - @Dolomite_io - @eulerfinance - @SiloFinance Yield: - @Pendle_fi - @sparkdotfi - @magpiexyz_io - @AuraFinance - @ConvexFinance - @beefyfinance DEXs: - @Uniswap - @0xfluid - @PancakeSwap - @0xtristero - @CamelotDEX - @native_fi - @CurveFinance - @NablaFi RWA: - @spiko_finance - @PleasingGolden - @MidasRWA - @Theo_Network - @Securitize - @DinariGlobal - @EstateProtocol Perps: - @etherealdex - @GMX_IO - @OstiumLabs - @Variational_io - @Rho_Labs - @Aark_Digital Consumer: - @BleapApp - @Fiat24Official - @AviciMoney - @PeanutProtocol - @holyheld - @0xSplits What did I miss? Hope you enjoyed this post and found some new VALUABLE information. If you wanna support me, I'd appreciate a like, reply, bookmark, and RT <3

     227  49  12.64K
    Original >
    Tendencia de ARB tras el lanzamiento
     Alcista
    Comprehensively showcase DeFi, RWA, Perps, and consumer application projects within the Arbitrum ecosystem.
  • 𝑺𝒂𝒗𝒐𝒚 🎮✌️ OnChain_Analyst Educator A
     5.60K  @Savoyonx
    Veee D
     3.38K  @vikktorrrre

    gutted from infofi abrupt end? if you built your x account and skill set during those times... you've got nothing to worry about 👍 to maximise all that advantage here are 10 ambassador programs to apply for. 1. @aigram_official Ambassador Program: https://t.co/IWCsMN6HLI 2. @arbitrum Ambassador Program: https://t.co/CX7ES81HSz 3. @cronos_chain Ambassador Program: https://t.co/0x0NPt7Ldi 4. @TryQensa Ambassador Program: https://t.co/0bOOJvTgi6 5. @Hela_Network Ambassador Program: https://t.co/Bg1YTxpkk0 6. @spaace_io Ambassador Program: https://t.co/M8cdGb85Dv 7.@burnt_xion Ambassador Program: https://t.co/fm5u6RjOVh 8. @Oroswap Ambassador Program: https://t.co/P0Grd57XRi 9.@brushlessai Ambassador Program: https://t.co/cc8MWNzhUb 10. @Verse_EightAmbassador Program: https://t.co/Ok7aFdbBR6 get to work!

     117  64  12.87K
    Original >
    Tendencia de ARB tras el lanzamiento
     Alcista
    The tweet encourages users to participate in multiple crypto projects' ambassador programs, seizing ecosystem development opportunities.
  • BlockchainBaller TA_Analyst Trader B
     30.94K  @bl_ockchain

    Bridge flows don’t lie This week alone, ~$16B moved through bridges Arbitrum still leading the pack Hyperliquid pulling serious size Base quietly stacking billions Money flows to where liquidity, UX, and yields make sense Bridges front-run narratives every cycle https://t.co/hCYaz3fqty

     52  21  5.04K
    Original >
    Tendencia de ARB tras el lanzamiento
     Alcista
    This week, bridge inflows approached $16B, with Arbitrum, Hyperliquid, and Base performing strongly.
  • BITWU.ETH 🔆 FA_Analyst OnChain_Analyst C
     354.74K  @Bitwux

    Well said! Paying someone or using money as a foundation to seek help is essentially faster and more in line with human nature; it's not shameful. But the crucial point is never about whether you paid or not, but whether after paying you have taken back the “right to think” and “judgment” into your own hands. In most cases, payment is just a link, a bridge; many people insist on treating it as a wealth password, and there's a Yellow River between them. Also, your comment about “laziness” is spot on, but I’d add a bit: many people are not physically lazy, but are lazy in thought + fear of decision‑making. They want to do things, yet they are unwilling to think independently and are afraid to be responsible for their own judgments, so they forever wait for a “definite answer”. Keeping distance from such people is the best choice.

    leaf🎒 D
     50.27K  @CandyDAO_leaf

    I strongly agree with this viewpoint. I used to think that almost all paid groups were just scamming people, and I had little favor towards them. However, some people are willing to exchange money for learning, knowledge, and time, and some even have a clear path: by paying, they quickly understand the knowledge gap, get familiar with the basic industry insights, and then consolidate on their own. (Of course, I will never get involved if I lack the ability and energy.) The second point is to build oneself, to become a valuable person who holds the means of production in one's own hands. This is indeed the hardest, but the reward of success is the greatest. Many people fail simply because they never even start. I attribute this reason to: laziness. Most of the failures are due to mental laziness, unwillingness to think. I believe that in terms of IQ, we’re not that different. If you constantly work on exercising your thinking ability, you don’t need to spend extra effort paying for others’ judgments. Of course, if you want to skip the initial learning process quickly, you can pay to obtain the initial knowledge, get up to speed, master it, and then deepen it yourself. This is also a way of thinking. If you just hope that paying will bring success, you will mostly fail, but in rare cases, the opportunity does arise. For example, grabbing an airdrop: a paid group tells you to “rush” a project, the airdrop drops, you succeed – that’s a direct success from payment. Previously, some paid groups promoted grabbing Arbitrum, Wormhole, etc., with similar outcomes. But have you truly mastered the means of production? The difference is simple – look at yourself: Is it luck money, or can you continuously earn? For instance, some people transition to becoming successful content creators, actively think about their future path, explore more ways to earn, and execute them, achieving sustained income rather than relying on luck. Not lazy: think more about ways to earn, then act. Specifics are countless – e.g., researching airdrop projects requires both thought and execution; networking upwards also needs thought and execution. The friend I just mentioned is also doing well with their account launch; although the methods are a bit crude, it doesn’t stop them from earning. Take Twitter account building in four steps – ‘Kill‑Break‑Wolf’, ‘Homework Brother’, and other popular female creators; aren’t they all successful this way? Details: https://t.co/LdtwtmixIa If you think about it, you must try it. One sentence: don’t be lazy. If you’re still a ‘loser’, think more, do more, consider realistic feasible paths, and pursue the path you envision. It’s not idle fantasy; idle fantasies of getting rich only exist in dreams. Of course, the most important thing 👇 all premises: Within the legal red line ⚠️ outside the regulatory boundaries. Details: https://t.co/g5CaAhjrHz

     30  27  9.43K
    Original >
    Tendencia de ARB tras el lanzamiento
     Neutral
    Paid access to Arbitrum airdrop information requires personal judgment.