Virtual Protocol (VIRTUAL)

In the VIRTUAL ecosystem, I recently accumulated these tokens on the dips: $VIRTUAL - core ecosystem token $GAME - core ecosystem infrastructure token $TIBBIR - AI Identity and KYA, Ribbitcapital (Stealth) $FACY - AI Truth Seeker $WIRE - Bank, OTC Settlement, and institutional insights $ADM - Yield Opportunities, AI, and Sentora (Stealth) $BKLH - Privacy infrastructure for wallets and transactions Did I miss anything? What would you add?

i'm long and strong betting on market structure making it and no one reading what it really means for several days to parse it's great for some coins (L1s, some DeFi) and horrendous for other coins likely to get mass delisted from U.S. exchanges ( $VIRTUAL?)

#VIRTUAL reached up to a 75% gain from the region we took, but at the $1.20 level, #USDT.D acted as a 5.80% rejection, making VIRTUAL resist as a rejection. As long as Dominance stays below 5.80%, those are the maximum price levels the assets can reach, friends. There shouldn’t be much expectation given this liquidity shortage https://t.co/QSsFGUU9hN

$VIRTUAL - price returned in the massive gap we put in on the 5th of January, with also 4h EMA100 confluence Strong reaction there - immediate reclaim of DO and PMH If we start putting green color on the weekly candle, we have a new runner 🤝 https://t.co/AJPAClCMCh

$VIRTUAL The price needs to hold above $0.86 to keep the upside momentum alive. One more high remains possible at the moment. https://t.co/uKymlvt98E

$VIRTUAL If this is an impulse forming from the 0.6293 low, the wave iv of the impulse might be playing out rn. Looking at the current structure of the correction and the duration of wave ii , which was ~12 days, I really feel that there is more to wave iv. The black scenario is my preferred one. But a wave iv can morph into many structures, so we will see how it unfolds. Overall, the price should hold the 0.9182 level to keep the upside momentum alive for the next wave v. Once we have five waves up, we'd be in a really good situation here.

gVirtual, For a long time, @virtuals_io launches were trying to solve everything with one hammer. It worked early, but it also created friction once the ecosystem grew up. This year already started with rebuilding the whole launch stack for its own agent ecosystem. They’ve split it cleanly into three lanes: Pegasus, Unicorn, and Titan. One ecosystem, same liquidity gravity, different intent. → Pegasus with no team allocation is pure signal extraction. Almost everything goes straight to LP, with a tiny slice for ecosystem airdrops. Founders only own what they buy, at the same price as degens. This lane is built for early builders just trying to find something. Most agents will die here, which is the point: cheap failures, clean data, no leftover resentment. → Unicorn is where conviction turns into capital. Unicorn already proved it works over the past few months. Early trading uses a decaying tax that starts high and cools down, killing sniper games and routing that volatility back into liquidity. Teams don’t get paid upfront because of Automated Capital Formation. They only raise meaningful capital after the agent proves traction, with funding scaling as FDV grows. Somewhere between a scrappy early project and a real business, Unicorn turns belief into capital without breaking alignment. → Titan is the grown‑up lane. If you’re already credible, already capitalized, already shipping, Titan gives you a clean, boring, TradFi‑coded market entry at a minimum $50M launch valuation. – liquidity pairing with at least 500k USDC worth of $VIRTUAL at TGE – flat 1% tax – tokenomics fully defined by the team Titan also lets existing agent tokens migrate in, as long as they bring real liquidity and accept ecosystem alignment. That’s huge if Virtuals wants to be the hub for agent tokens. The mechanics way better than the old one‑size‑fits‑all era. But will this actually make the Virtual eco come back? Virtuals learned three lessons: – fair launches don’t automatically create conviction – conviction without a funding path caps builder quality – big teams won’t touch thin liquidity setups This new framework is them trying to keep the ecosystem cohesive while still giving teams the right launch tool at the right time. All three mechanisms are aggressively “$VIRTUAL‑pilled” since they bind liquidity to $VIRTUAL. That means it can trend back if more agents launch and more liquidity gets paired. My only real concern is Titan’s gatekeeping. It’ll look exclusive to retail, and if the first few Titan launches don’t deliver, CT will clown it fast. Still, solid design overall. Always ready to fill bids if legit agents roll out from here.

People be saying the 10/10 crash was not predictable, FUUU https://t.co/eU5B04HFRU