Uniswap (UNI)

$3.515  +0.09%  24H

Social Sentiment Index (SSI)

Market Pulse Ranking (MPR)

X Posts

  • Nick Research Derivatives_Expert OnChain_Analyst S
     10.20K  @Nick_Researcher

    ➥ DeFi’s liquidity problem is bigger than I thought I’ve provided liquidity across enough DEXs to know the feeling of watching my position move out of range and earn zero fees I used to assume this was mainly a timing problem, but the data suggests it is structural New research by Dune and @1inch found that 85% of DeFi liquidity is underutilized at any given time, representing up to $1.6B in capital As of June 30, around $580-590M was sitting fully idle and out of range, mine was probably somewhere in there And we already know what that means, it earned no fees and provided no trading depth This was not the result of one unusually volatile week either Across 26 weekly snapshots from January 6 to June 30, 2026, an average of 29.5% of concentrated liquidity capital was out of range The mechanics are simple: - LP capital only works within its selected price range - Once the market moves outside that range, the position stops working until someone rebalances it Manual management is painful af. It is slow, costly, and easy to mistime This is a serious market-structure problem DeFi wants to bring TradFi’s trillions onchain, but it still cannot keep today’s billions fully utilized Before DeFi scales the amount of capital, it first needs to improve how efficiently existing capital is used And considering that @1inch co-authored this research, it feels like they may be doing more than just identifying the problem I wouldn't be surprised if something is already being built under the hood to make onchain liquidity more adaptive and capital‑efficient

    Nick Research Derivatives_Expert OnChain_Analyst S
     10.20K  @Nick_Researcher

    Full research by Dune and 1inch: https://t.co/tgR89vnoeT

     21  13  747
    Original >
    Trend of UNI after release
     Bearish
    DeFi流动性存在严重利用不足问题，85%资金闲置，但1inch或正开发解决方案。
  • arndxt FA_Analyst OnChain_Analyst C
     46.65K  @arndxt_xo
    YashasEdu FA_Analyst OnChain_Analyst B
     9.44K  @YashasEdu

    New research by @dune and @1inch tracked concentrated liquidity on Uniswap, PancakeSwap and Aerodrome across 7 chains for 26 weeks. 85% of DeFi liquidity is underutilized at any one time i.e up to $1.6B doing nothing. ➥ ~$600M is fully idle and out of range ➥ LPs in those positions are missing ~$175–195M in fees every year On average, 29.5% of concentrated capital stayed out of range across the whole period. Even the highest-turnover concentrated pools still leave massive TVL stagnant, while the vast majority of stablecoin supply never enters DeFi yield pools at all. This isn’t a temporary issue, it’s like a structural problem now. The good news is 1inch is building a fix to solve this.

     39  23  2.61K
    Original >
    Trend of UNI after release
     Bullish
    Research shows DeFi liquidity utilization is low, and 1inch is developing a solution.
  • Bitcoin.com News Media Influencer D
     3.27M  @BitcoinNews

    📈 Coinbase trading volume maintains a lead over Uniswap, with the gap widening through Q1-Q2 2026. 📊 Per Bitwise data, Uniswap briefly closed the gap in 2025 before Coinbase pulled ahead. https://t.co/L11jnz7IwA

     21  9  15.78K
    Original >
    Trend of UNI after release
     Neutral
    Coinbase trading volume continues to lead Uniswap, with the gap expected to widen by 2026.
  • Stablecoin Sean FA_Analyst OnChain_Analyst B
     24.55K  @seanlippel
    Stablecoin Sean FA_Analyst OnChain_Analyst B
     24.55K  @seanlippel

    i've seen tons of implementations of uni v4 hooks that are actually novel the one everyone is trying to pump on RH is probably the least interesting one i've ever seen (it's essentially just a heavy token tax and random RWA index) besides the fact that index tokens have never worked in crypto, is the dev even doxxed? or are the contracts audited? i'd rather die holding a meme in cash cat . . . just please know what you are holding . i think … i ... i a ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... i R i R i r R ... ...... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ..... ..... ... ...

     67  7  6.03K
    Original >
    Trend of UNI after release
     Bearish
    警惕RH高税指数代币，勿追高
  • spacebyte ⛓ FA_Analyst OnChain_Analyst A
     21.99K  @_thespacebyte
    YashasEdu FA_Analyst OnChain_Analyst B
     9.44K  @YashasEdu

    New research by @dune and @1inch tracked concentrated liquidity on Uniswap, PancakeSwap and Aerodrome across 7 chains for 26 weeks. 85% of DeFi liquidity is underutilized at any one time i.e up to $1.6B doing nothing. ➥ ~$600M is fully idle and out of range ➥ LPs in those positions are missing ~$175–195M in fees every year On average, 29.5% of concentrated capital stayed out of range across the whole period. Even the highest-turnover concentrated pools still leave massive TVL stagnant, while the vast majority of stablecoin supply never enters DeFi yield pools at all. This isn’t a temporary issue, it’s like a structural problem now. The good news is 1inch is building a fix to solve this.

     39  23  2.61K
    Original >
    Trend of UNI after release
     Bearish
    Research reveals low DeFi liquidity utilization, and 1inch is addressing this structural issue.
  • THEDEFIPLUG FA_Analyst OnChain_Analyst B
     52.29K  @TheDeFiPlug
    YashasEdu FA_Analyst OnChain_Analyst B
     9.44K  @YashasEdu

    New research by @dune and @1inch tracked concentrated liquidity on Uniswap, PancakeSwap and Aerodrome across 7 chains for 26 weeks. 85% of DeFi liquidity is underutilized at any one time i.e up to $1.6B doing nothing. ➥ ~$600M is fully idle and out of range ➥ LPs in those positions are missing ~$175–195M in fees every year On average, 29.5% of concentrated capital stayed out of range across the whole period. Even the highest-turnover concentrated pools still leave massive TVL stagnant, while the vast majority of stablecoin supply never enters DeFi yield pools at all. This isn’t a temporary issue, it’s like a structural problem now. The good news is 1inch is building a fix to solve this.

     39  23  2.61K
    Original >
    Trend of UNI after release
     Bearish
    Dune and 1inch research reveals that 85% of DeFi liquidity is underutilized, and 1inch is developing a solution.
  • Nova TA_Analyst OnChain_Analyst C
     146.07K  @CryptoGirlNova
    Nova TA_Analyst OnChain_Analyst C
     146.07K  @CryptoGirlNova

    Retail lacked something new and exciting this cycle. Probably the reason why alts have seen so much underperformance or a drought in liquidity. I never really participated in Axie infinity but I was earlier on a few other games were I legit was makes 10-50 euro daily on playing that game. In 2017 just entering crypto was enough. The entire space was exciting because we interacted for the first time. Using an exchange was already semi-had but exciting to learn. A few years later and Uniswap entered the picture. In 2017 we already had etherdelta or idex but those were a nightmare imo. Uniswap kickstarted dex season for real and gave us another reason to spend hours online. But even later and one of my favorites? Gamefi. I never got into Axie Infinity a lot but I did dabble in a few other games were I was legit earning 10-50 euro daily (this didn't last though). NFTs, yield farming, ... We've had plenty of stuff every cycle. Today? Nothing Either we already have everything there is to invent or we ju

     150  28  13.92K
    Original >
    Trend of UNI after release
     Bearish
    The overall market lacks new projects, leading to a liquidity drought for altcoins and weak performance.
  • Frigg 🌸 OnChain_Analyst FA_Analyst C
     68.14K  @0xfrigg

    the value thesis for $UNI is no longer "will the fee switch come?" the fee switch is on. the real question now is: does volume actually convert to protocol fee, does protocol fee flow to TokenJar, and does TokenJar consistently convert to UNI burn? the Robinhood Chain proposal aims to add v2, v3, and v4 fees into this cycle that's positive but you don't build a valuation on a proposal or a burn headline alone the sequence required for sustainable value accrual: usage ➛ fee ➛ TokenJar ➛ burn ➛ net supply impact pricing the last step before the first three are visible isn't buying the mechanism it's buying the headline

    Frigg 🌸 OnChain_Analyst FA_Analyst C
     68.14K  @0xfrigg

    the real shift for $UNI isn't Uniswap doing more volume it's what mechanism connects that volume to the token Uniswap v4 generated ~$24.8M in swap fees in the last 30 days but protocol revenue: $0 that's not a failure, it means the mechanism isn't active yet this is exactly where the v4 fee switch proposal matters swap fee and protocol fee aren't the same thing on Uniswap. the majority of swap fees go to LPs. if governance activates the protocol fee, a portion of that fee in certain pools gets redirected to the protocol that value then accumulates in TokenJar. any party wanting to claim assets from TokenJar has to burn $UNI in return. so the model isn't direct dividends: volume ➛ protocol fee ➛ TokenJar ➛ $UNI burn after UNIfication in December 2025 this mechanism started running on v2 and select v3 pools. on v3, ~$31.6M in fees generated $4.0M in protocol revenue in the last 30 days v4 is the bigger opportunity but harder to execute because v4 doesn't have fixed fee tiers. pools can use dynamic

     89  25  1.54K
    Original >
    Trend of UNI after release
     Neutral
    The UNI fee switch has been activated, but V4 has not captured any protocol revenue, and the token value realization mechanism remains to be observed.
  • nairolf Educator Derivatives_Expert B
     40.22K  @0xNairolf

    update: robinhood chain now accounts for 75% of uniswap fees two consecutive days above $6m pretty insane https://t.co/hksJRsq4U1

    nairolf Educator Derivatives_Expert B
     40.22K  @0xNairolf

    robinhood will end up being one of the best things to happen to uniswap how insane is that impact god damn https://t.co/ArW8uJiLtg

     41  14  3.38K
    Original >
    Trend of UNI after release
     Extremely Bullish
    Robinhood Chain (ZKsync Era) has caused Uniswap fees to skyrocket, exceeding $6 million for two consecutive days, and the author believes its impact is huge.
  • YashasEdu FA_Analyst OnChain_Analyst B
     9.44K  @YashasEdu

    New research by @dune and @1inch tracked concentrated liquidity on Uniswap, PancakeSwap and Aerodrome across 7 chains for 26 weeks. 85% of DeFi liquidity is underutilized at any one time i.e up to $1.6B doing nothing. ➥ ~$600M is fully idle and out of range ➥ LPs in those positions are missing ~$175–195M in fees every year On average, 29.5% of concentrated capital stayed out of range across the whole period. Even the highest-turnover concentrated pools still leave massive TVL stagnant, while the vast majority of stablecoin supply never enters DeFi yield pools at all. This isn’t a temporary issue, it’s like a structural problem now. The good news is 1inch is building a fix to solve this.

     39  23  2.61K
    Original >
    Trend of UNI after release
     Bullish
    Research shows DeFi liquidity utilization is low, and 1inch is developing a solution.