Bittensor (TAO)

General Tensor has closed $5M across pre-seed and seed rounds. Seed anchored by Good Morning Holdings (a fund backed by Goldman Sachs). Pre-seed led by @LvnaCapital with @DCGco, @XVentures_Fund, @proofoftalk & Outliers Fund. Decentralized AI infrastructure is getting built. 🔧 https://t.co/xBgYAHvigH

$TAO $TAO CT shilling this sht so hard and I already clear my plan for it. Now saying again, as long it below this level shorting is makes sense 👌🏻 https://t.co/HK31p7A25t

The Case Against Protocol-Level Shorting ======================================== This article serves as an urgent warning to the Bittensor community regarding what could be one of the most serious blunders in our history. My goal is to highlight these risks before the proposal is finalized, in the hope that we can avoid a catastrophic outcome. We are all frustrated by the "crap," "scam," and "extractor" subnets infiltrating the dTAO ecosystem. While every blockchain deals with its fair share of low-quality projects, they usually coexist peacefully with legitimate development. In Bittensor, however, the situation is different. Because of how our emission system is hard‑coded into the protocol, these subnets effectively leech TAO from legitimate projects, slowly stifling their chances of success. Something must be done. The original dTAO design assumed the market would naturally filter out rogue projects; this did not happen. A deregistration system was subsequently introduced to "fix" the process, yet the

$TAO As you know, I am not a holder, and in fact I have very few altcoins in my portfolio. This is one of the rare exceptions. It is a name I chose consciously and I will continue to accumulate it slowly, without haste and without emotion. If the idea works and the project goes ahead, fine: I will have been right in my selection and timing. If, on the other hand, it goes badly, even to zero, it won't change anything for me: it's a calculated risk, taken into account from the outset. That's the point. Don't fall in love with the name, don't tell yourself stories, don't get your hopes up. Just make a clear-headed decision about how much risk you want to allocate to that asset, and that's it.

$TAO As you know, I am not a holder, and in fact I have very few altcoins in my portfolio. This is one of the rare exceptions. It is a name I chose consciously and I will continue to accumulate it slowly, without haste and without emotion. If the idea works and the project goes ahead, fine: I will have been right in my selection and timing. If, on the other hand, it goes badly, even to zero, it won't change anything for me: it's a calculated risk, taken into account from the outset. That's the point. Don't fall in love with the name, don't tell yourself stories, don't get your hopes up. Just make a clear-headed decision about how much risk you want to allocate to that asset, and that's it.

Spent some time with The Carrot discussing many things #Bittensor. Subnets, governance, startups, and more. Thank you to the great team at @TAO_dot_com for this pod and for the time to discuss this amazing eco. @YumaGroup $TAO https://t.co/YJt4a3HXso