PlaysOut (PLAY)

$0.02939  -1.90%  24H

Social Sentiment Index (SSI)

Market Pulse Ranking (MPR)

X Posts

  • CryptoManiaks Educator Researcher D
     7.06K  @CryptoManiaks

    Launch Spotlight: Play Solana ($PLAY) 🎮 A retro-style handheld console turned Web3 gaming hub. Here’s what really happened at launch 🧵 https://t.co/6WGctjdEVa

    CryptoManiaks Educator Researcher D
     7.06K  @CryptoManiaks

    What It Is Play Solana combines the PSG1 handheld, Android gaming, on-chain signing, and the $PLAY token. Think Game Boy meets Web3.

    CryptoManiaks Educator Researcher D
     7.06K  @CryptoManiaks

    Launch Turbulence The Q4 2025 TGE faced: • Unauthorized early trading • Shipping delays • Confusing airdrop eligibility • Heavy sell pressure that sent $PLAY below presale price

    CryptoManiaks Educator Researcher D
     7.06K  @CryptoManiaks

    Why It Stands Out A hardware-first approach with no VC control. Aiming to become a “super hub” for: • Games • NFTs • Creators • Payments • On-device signing

    CryptoManiaks Educator Researcher D
     7.06K  @CryptoManiaks

    The Risks ⚠️ No killer game yet ⚠️ $329 price may limit adoption ⚠️ Token utility still unclear ⚠️ Launch chaos hurt trust

    CryptoManiaks Educator Researcher D
     7.06K  @CryptoManiaks

    The Maniak Take Play Solana has big ambition — but execution will decide if $PLAY becomes a gaming hub or fades out. Worth watching not aping. 👉 Full spotlight: https://t.co/7exARfg1WW 👉 Subscribe to Don’t Get Rekt for weekly crypto insights: https://t.co/iqfXKZSwmK https://t.co/P0JtJjFhU5

     0  1  39
    Original >
    Trend of PLAY after release
     Bearish
    The Play Solana project has potential but its launch was chaotic; the $PLAY token faces high risk and selling pressure, recommending to wait and observe.
  • Crypto Bae 🎀 Media Community_Lead B
     11.33K  @cryptobae
    Play Solana | PSG1 D
     123.98K  @playsolana

    We want to address the recent concerns surrounding the Community Airdrop and provide full clarity, transparency, and a constructive path forward that respects everyone who has supported Play Solana since day one. During the CGE (Claim Generation Event), a communication gap unfortunately led to confusion, which quickly snowballed into misinformation and frustration. Today, we want to correct this and reestablish clarity across the entire community. During the claim, Players had two options: 1. Immediate $PLAY Liquidity: -Claim 70% immediately, with a 30% cut. 2. Staking for 3/6/9/12 months: -Receive the full 100% allocation at the end of the selected period, plus a bonus of 10% / 30% / 60% / 100%, respectively. This mechanism was designed for long-term sustainability: reduce short-term selling pressure and reward those who believe in the long-term vision of the PlaySolana <SuperHUB>. And to be absolutely clear: the 30% cut was never intended to be kept by the team. It was always planned to be redirec

     518  151  145.10K
    Original >
    Trend of PLAY after release
     Neutral
    PLAY airdrop details announced, encouraging long-term staking
  • Crypto Bae 🎀 Media Community_Lead B
     11.33K  @cryptobae
    Play Solana | PSG1 D
     123.98K  @playsolana

    To fully address what happened yesterday, we will be releasing a complete post-mortem detailing everything the team and our partners uncovered regarding the set of unfortunate events that unfolded prior to the $PLAY launch. We will also outline a clear course of action to ensure we remain on track and that our community can rest assured we are here for a long, continuous journey. We also want to touch on the 24 wallets identified as the root cause of this issue. These wallets were able to bypass the Metaplex Web2 logic used to block users from claiming $PLAY prior to 12.30pm UTC, and are in no way, shape, or form connected to us or anyone associated with Play Solana. A full breakdown of our findings will be included in the post-mortem report. These wallets managed to initiate trading activity before launch. While our team was on a call with our Liquidity Managers, we noticed unexpected price movements that immediately raised concern - especially considering no tokens should have been available for trading.

     542  251  119.65K
    Original >
    Trend of PLAY after release
     Neutral
    PLAY releases post-mortem report, explaining the vulnerability and pledging a fix.
  • ⚡️ Flash [GyB] ⚡️ Trader NFT_Expert B
     9.07K  @gameplaysybugs
    Play Solana | PSG1 D
     123.98K  @playsolana

    To fully address what happened yesterday, we will be releasing a complete post-mortem detailing everything the team and our partners uncovered regarding the set of unfortunate events that unfolded prior to the $PLAY launch. We will also outline a clear course of action to ensure we remain on track and that our community can rest assured we are here for a long, continuous journey. We also want to touch on the 24 wallets identified as the root cause of this issue. These wallets were able to bypass the Metaplex Web2 logic used to block users from claiming $PLAY prior to 12.30pm UTC, and are in no way, shape, or form connected to us or anyone associated with Play Solana. A full breakdown of our findings will be included in the post-mortem report. These wallets managed to initiate trading activity before launch. While our team was on a call with our Liquidity Managers, we noticed unexpected price movements that immediately raised concern - especially considering no tokens should have been available for trading.

     542  251  119.65K
    Original >
    Trend of PLAY after release
     Bearish
    PLAY price volatility caused by premature trading anomaly; team will publish post-mortem report and implement corrections.
  • CryptoMaMa Educator Influencer C
     142.50K  @1CryptoMama

    Lmao it’s the max extraction season bro Some investors invested $100,000 each at a $70 million fully diluted valuation (FDV). Some WL presalers bought more at $40 million because investors’ entry was at a $70 million FDV. They hoped the price would increase when it hit Kraken, at least to $80 million or more The token was launched, but its FDV never reached $70 million. The current FDV is $14 million. I heard Some investors sold at 50% lose

     90  35  18.03K
    Original >
    Trend of PLAY after release
     Extremely Bearish
    VULT token plummeted from a high valuation, with the current FDV at only $14 million, causing heavy losses for investors.
  • ILERI 🕊️ TA_Analyst Researcher B
     2.84K  @bapking_boss

    TL;DR same old story: - insiders win - users get scraps - presalers get rekt - team says “we never sold!” like that fixes anything - raised millions but won’t make people whole same thing anichess game did i hope rainbowdotme (gae wallet😂) doesn’t rug me like this tho gm Fastlife

    𝗙𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗟𝗶𝗳𝗲 D
     88.86K  @FastLife

    And at $PLAY 's actual valuation $40M, it's worth how much ? Always pays for itself? LMAOOO, the same story over and over again: '' 𝑾𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒘𝒆 𝒄𝒂𝒏 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒊𝒓𝒎 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝒇𝒖𝒍𝒍 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆: 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑻𝒆𝒂𝒎, 𝑰𝒏𝒗𝒆𝓈𝓉𝑜𝓇𝓈, 𝒞𝑜𝓃𝓉𝓇𝓲𝓫𝓾𝓉𝑜𝓇𝓈, 𝒶𝓃𝒹 𝒶𝓃𝔂𝑜𝓃𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓃𝑒𝒸𝓉𝑒𝒹 𝓉𝑜 𝑷𝓁𝓎 𝒮𝑜𝓁𝒶𝓃𝒶 𝒽𝒶𝓋𝑒 𝓈𝓸𝓁𝓁𝒹 𝔃𝒆𝓇𝑜 𝓉𝑜𝓀𝑒𝓃𝓈. '' ___ Good to always tell the shtt, the truth is also and above all that: 1. Binance alpha users was able to claims and dumps half an hour earlier than the whole community and presalers. 2. Real users received 30% less tokens than they expected for Play Solana’s community airdrop. Source Metaplex: This was a decision made by the Play Solana team regarding staking. So you lied to your community by changing terms at the last minute! 3. Some wallets that participated in the onchain token sale were able to claim earlier than intended (it seems a problem related to Metaplex). The result is that, you sht on users by offering them a crappy airdrop, vested or slashed. AND you sht on presalers with a price 2-2.5x lower than the one at which

     4  3  396
    Original >
    Trend of PLAY after release
     Extremely Bearish
    Play Solana project is accused of deceiving users and presalers, leading to token crash and user losses.
  • Crypto Bae 🎀 Media Community_Lead B
     11.33K  @cryptobae
    0xjay D
     23.83K  @0xjaynfts

    I want to appreciate everyone across the ecosystem who DMed me personally regarding the incident during today’s $PLAY launch. The team is currently addressing everything that happened. On a personal note, I’ll refrain from making any further comments for now. The launch definitely didn’t go as planned, not even in a worst-case scenario. Enjoy your weekend. I’m off to a great start.

     165  78  12.93K
    Original >
    Trend of PLAY after release
     Bearish
    PLAY had issuance issues, short-term outlook is poor
  • Crypto Bae 🎀 Media Community_Lead B
     11.33K  @cryptobae
    Crypto Bae 🎀 Media Community_Lead B
     11.33K  @cryptobae

    from what's known so far there was a breach connected to a $PLAY token genesis on metaplex not exactly the tge that I expected but - I'd wait till the end of investigation, I don't believe the team rugged - shall I buy now https://t.co/tEgSpA3kPc

     47  23  5.44K
    Original >
    Trend of PLAY after release
     Extremely Bearish
    The PLAY token plunged 86.14% due to an issuance vulnerability, and the author recommends waiting for the investigation results.
  • ƓIΛΝ⛓.🟧⏳👾 OnChain_Analyst Researcher B
     1.18K  @wanagiamma

    Not blaming playsolana but whats behind every token launch and infra. Now people will be scared to even buy a presale. You completely finished the whole crypto space, especially on solana. I'm here for the long term vision of gaming industry but what will you all do if users won't participate in a presale anymore, or buy or stake or whatever? Well, i know you all busy milking institutions and wall street people but you won't go anywhere withouth users. And i say it since 1 year. Pool was tradable 1 HOUR BEFORE TGE, from GMGN for example.

    Metaplex 🦾 D
     109.76K  @metaplex

    During today's $PLAY launch, we identified a small timing mismatch that allowed participants to claim early. There were no compromises to the onchain Genesis infrastructure and the Genesis program is operating exactly as originally configured. One rarely used Web2 API route was not sufficiently validating the launch time and 24 wallets were able to circumvent the start time override. The route has already been patched and we’ve verified no other paths were affected.

     2  0  154
    Original >
    Trend of PLAY after release
     Bearish
    Users lose trust in presales, causing setbacks in the crypto ecosystem, need to restore user participation
  • Crypto Bae 🎀 Media Community_Lead B
     11.33K  @cryptobae
    Metaplex 🦾 D
     109.76K  @metaplex

    During today's $PLAY launch, we identified a small timing mismatch that allowed participants to claim early. There were no compromises to the onchain Genesis infrastructure and the Genesis program is operating exactly as originally configured. One rarely used Web2 API route was not sufficiently validating the launch time and 24 wallets were able to circumvent the start time override. The route has already been patched and we’ve verified no other paths were affected.

     177  179  45.33K
    Original >
    Trend of PLAY after release
     Neutral
    PLAY issuance experienced a timing bug which has been fixed, with no price impact at this time