Near Protocol (NEAR)

$1.354  -3.35%  24H

Social Sentiment Index (SSI)

Market Pulse Ranking (MPR)

X Posts

  • NEAR Protocol Dev Community_Lead D
     1.85M  @NEARProtocol
    NEAR Intents D
     8.98K  @near_intents

    NEAR Intents is now live on @Unigox_global. Enabling seamless USDT flows on @ton_blockchain. https://t.co/YzFeV6fSmd

     24  6  3.59K
    Original >
    Trend of NEAR after release
     Bullish
    NEAR Intents已在Unigox上线,实现USDT在TON区块链上的无缝流动。
  • Vini B |「 thecoding 」 Developer Community Lead B
     11.06K  @vinibarbosabr
    Colbert D
     6.89K  @sirshibaninja

    Tried the ironclaw @near_ai and it had a weird error loop. Tool error: Tool memory_write execution failed: Invalid parameters: Either 'content' (for write/append) or 'old_string'+'new_string' (for patch) is required Input: { "append": false, "content": null, "force": false, "target": null Decided to stop for awhile and rebuild it again.

     5  4  253
    Original >
    Trend of NEAR after release
     Bearish
    NEAR's ironclaw tool reported an error, decided to pause and rebuild it.
  • Vadim Developer Researcher A
     11.30K  @zacodil

    Don’t mess with NEAR https://t.co/0kvsD5OguS

    Vadim Developer Researcher A
     11.30K  @zacodil

    Context below https://t.co/IWU34YvpCN

     38  4  2.91K
    Original >
    Trend of NEAR after release
     Bullish
    The tweet suggests that NEAR is strong and should not be underestimated.
  • NEAR Protocol Dev Community_Lead D
     1.85M  @NEARProtocol

    AI is moving from answering questions to taking action. Who owns that intelligence and the data behind it matters. NEAR AI is the user-owned infrastructure for the agentic era: - Private inference via TEEs - Always-on agents in encrypted enclaves (@IronClawAI) https://t.co/qSFFQIRPua

     231  14  7.69K
    Original >
    Trend of NEAR after release
     Extremely Bullish
    NEAR AI provides user-owned AI infrastructure, empowering the era of autonomous agents.
  • Vini B |「 thecoding 」 Developer Community Lead B
     11.06K  @vinibarbosabr

    NEAR Intents (1Click Quoting) is back online! The protocol was stopped yesterday, following the RHEA Finance hack, to prevent wider ecosystem spread with the stolen funds It's now fully operational again, which suggests positive developments https://t.co/Ysc7KOh1py

    Vini B |「 thecoding 」 Developer Community Lead B
     11.06K  @vinibarbosabr

    https://t.co/JV7NI8zS5m

     37  3  1.43K
    Original >
    Trend of NEAR after release
     Extremely Bullish
    NEAR Intents is back online, previously paused due to the RHEA Finance attack, with user funds unharmed.
  • Preetam | QuillAudits 🥷 Security_Expert Educator B
     5.99K  @raopreetam_
    QuillAudits D
     14.59K  @QuillAudits_AI

    🚨 @rhea_finance on NEAR was exploited for ~$18.6M In what on-chain data shows was a fully rehearsed, professional operation. Root cause: Rhea priced collateral from Ref Finance liquidity pools. The attacker minted their own worthless tokens, seeded their own pools with them, and Rhea's oracle happily valued the fakes as real, then lent real USDC, USDt, ZEC, and NEAR against them. Oracle manipulation + no token allowlist.

     66  5  5.60K
    Original >
    Trend of NEAR after release
     Extremely Bearish
    Rhea Finance was exploited on NEAR for about $18.6 M due to oracle manipulation.
  • Bitcoinsensus TA_Analyst Trader C
     128.93K  @Bitcoinsensus
    Bitcoinsensus TA_Analyst Trader C
     128.93K  @Bitcoinsensus

    NEAR BREAKING OUT FROM A FALLING WEDGE 📈 NEAR is attempting a breakout from its falling wedge 🟢 That shift puts the recent compression pattern in focus, with price now trying to build momentum away from the base ⚡ #NEAR #Crypto #Altcoins https://t.co/ErwuSxWApJ

     17  1  1.53K
    Original >
    Trend of NEAR after release
     Extremely Bullish
    NEAR breaks out of a falling wedge pattern, showing strong upward momentum.
  • Raccoon Chan 小浣熊 Derivatives_Expert Community_Lead B
     38.39K  @RaccoonHKG

    If you're being compliant, you can't temporarily freeze in an emergency. Those banks freeze crypto users' bank accounts all day, assuming guilt. Is that really non-compliant? https://t.co/90UsZxBdyu

    土澳大狮兄BroLeon | 🔶BNB | D
     114.62K  @BroLeon

    Yesterday a protocol on Near was hacked, and Tether immediately froze the 3.29M stolen assets as soon as it learned of it. The CEO posted a very simple tweet: Tether cares. The post blew up, garnering 130,000 views, nearly a thousand likes, and even some comments saying “Long live Tether” 😂😂 Why? Because it was highlighted by its peers. Both were hacked, both are stablecoin issuers, Circle’s and Tether’s responses are like products of two different eras. During the Drift incident, the community immediately called for Circle to freeze the funds, What happened? Selective deafness. They kept dragging until public pressure became unbearable, then finally issued a notice: “We need compliance approval; we cannot freeze arbitrarily.” That statement isn’t wrong, but the problem is the users’ money was being hacked while you’re talking about procedures. At that moment the feeling was summed up in one word: Cold Now look at today: after the Near incident, Tether’s response was to freeze immediately, stop the bleeding first. No long list of procedural explanations, no high‑and‑mighty attitude, just a simple logic: “First, protect the users’ money.” And don’t forget, Tether actually put over $100 million of real cash to help clean up the Drift aftermath. Comparing the two events, the contrast is striking: One is thinking “Is it compliant?” The other is thinking “Should we rescue?” One is becoming more like a traditional financial institution, The other is more like crypto purism. Circle clearly also grew out of the wild crypto soil, but now it’s bureaucratic, sluggish, process‑first. It’s becoming more like a “traditional financial institution sitting in an office” rather than a participant standing with users. That “I follow the rules, it’s not my problem” vibe is, honestly, quite off‑putting. On the other hand, many people used to think Tether wasn’t “legitimate” enough, but at critical moments it at least stands on the users’ side, at least knows what users truly care about. I know many Circle friends are now sitting comfortably on $Crcl, but this time I just had to vent – investing and watching are two different things. It’s not about who is more compliant, but who resembles their original self more.

     22  6  5.37K
    Original >
    Trend of NEAR after release
     Bullish
    Tether quickly freezes stolen coins, performing better than Circle.
  • BitKE Media Regulatory_Expert D
     10.23K  @BitcoinKE

    Founder of Crypto VC Fund, Assymetric, Arrested in Zanzibar 🇹🇿 Following Death of Fiancee Assymetric has invested in multiple crypto companies and protocols such as #Turnkey, #Jambo, #NEAR, #Fractal, #Bitlayer, and #SEI among others. https://t.co/99gpUmQBDJ

     1  0  97
    Original >
    Trend of NEAR after release
     Bearish
    Founder of Crypto VC Fund Assymetric arrested after fiancée's death; the fund has invested in projects such as NEAR, SEI, etc.
  • DotSama 🧲 FA_Analyst Tokenomics_Expert B
     17.76K  @D0tSama
    0x.Bênav D
     396  @0x_Benav

    TL;DR for @rhea_finance Exploit → $7.6M drained from NEAR’s top DeFi hub (Ref + Burrow merger). Confirmed by @CertiK. → Attacker deployed fake token contracts, seeded liquidity in fresh pools, then manipulated the oracle + validation layer to extract real assets (USDC, USDT, ZEC, NEAR, etc.). Straight “synthetic assets trick oracle” play. → The team has paused contracts, investigating with security partners, and sent an on-chain message to the exploiter. No recovery yet. → Hit 6% of TVL a big blow to the chain’s dominant liquidity layer. Stay Safe friends

     14  0  4.77K
    Original >
    Trend of NEAR after release
     Bearish
    NEAR DeFi core was attacked, resulting in a loss of $7.6M, with TVL down about 6%