TON Token (TON)

It's Official! $TON is rebranding to $GRAM.

The recent proposal to rebrand @ton_blockchain's Toncoin to 'Gram' has been passed, with $TON holders voting 81.22% in favour of the change per MSB.

The change will come into effect in just a few days time on June 15.

Is this the start of a whole new bullish era for the $TON ecosystem...?

TL;DR: $TON to $GRAM rebranding is useless.

"We just changed the name of the native token. It was a crucial milestone on our journey!..."

If you're wondering, is TON as the blockchain being renamed? No. It's only about the native token.

1. People think rebranding is a change of name and logo, but hell NO, rebranding is a change of the whole concept.

A great example is @SonicLabs, which initially was Fantom, and after rebranding, they went from 200 TPS to 10K TPS, gained $1.3B in TVL, and changed their tokenomics.

A year later, $S eventually died and is down -96.9% from listing price. The rebranding didn't really help.

2. Were there any successful rebrandings at all?

- From MakerDAO to @SkyEcosystem: 1/10 (people liked MakerDAO more; just a name, ok?)
- From Okex to @okx: 8/10
- From Galaxy to @Galxe: 2/10 (just a name, ok?)
- From Huobi to @HTX: 0/10
- From Matic to Polygon: 1/10 (okay?...)
- From Havven to Synthetix: 3/10 (sounds way better?)

3. Why would projects make rebrandings?

In my opinion, th