Get Started
Scan to Download App
iOS & Android
BitMart / Crypto / ZKJ

Polyhedra Network (ZKJ)

$
$ 0.025 (ZKJ/USD)
8.94%
24H
1H24H1W1M1YALL
How Do You Feel About ZKJ? today?
Bullish 0
Bearish 0
Bullish
Bearish
Bullish 0
Bearish 0
Note: This information is for reference only.

Polyhedra Network Live Price data

Today's price of Polyhedra Network Is $ 0.025 (ZKJ/USD). With A Market Cap Of $ 14.83M USD. 24-Hour Trading Volume Of $ 207.13K USD, A 24-Hour Price Change Of +8.02%, And A Circulating Supply Of 579.89M ZKJ.

Polyhedra Network ZKJ Price History USD

Track the price of Polyhedra Network for today, 7 days, 30 days and 90 days
Period
Change
Change (%)
Today
0
8.94%
7days
--
--
30days
--
--
90days
0
-63.94%

Own ZKJ Now

Buy and sell ZKJ easily and securely on BitMart.
Buy/Sell ZKJ Now
Buy/Sell {0} Now
Polyhedra Network Market Information
Last price $ 0.025
$ 0.020 24h Range $ 0.025
All time high
‎$ 3.87‎
All time low
‎$ 0.020‎
24h Change
‎8.02%‎
24h Vol
‎$ 207,131.93‎
Circulating supply
385.74M ZKJ
Market cap
‎$ 9.87M‎
Max supply
1.00B ZKJ
Fully diluted market cap
‎$ 25.58M‎

Earn

Put your idle crypto to work and earn passive income through savings, staking, and more.
Try Now
Try Now

Polyhedra Network X Insight

avatar
The author reviews trades, emphasizing profit‑taking, stop‑loss and risk management, with profits from the Lighter_xyz project.

✍️Year‑end summary for 2025, doing the right things with the right people

Actually it’s a bit of a review: I’ve stepped into basically every pitfall and missed every opportunity, but I managed to catch a ride on @Lighter_xyz at the very end of 2025, which I’ll write about later.

🌟Stick to being a holder, but a holder can end up being foolish

Anyone who saw me calling out @PolyhedraZK mid‑year knows that $ZKJ I got on last year and held into this year dropped from 3 U to 0.03 U 🤣, and the position was quite large – just buying on conviction.

I had a chance to cut losses then, but I kept believing, kept holding, and nothing happened.

In this version, the fate of all copy‑cat holders is pretty much the same – half a pound, half a kilo. This round taught me: cash out when you’re making money, cut the loss quickly when you’re in the red, and don’t think you can survive a 100× drop only to ride a 10 000× rally later.

Insider opportunities only appear when liquidity is at its best. I missed the real money‑making wave on many projects on @binance, and after that trying to pump the price was impossible.

🌟On‑chain I kept trying to eat everything in one go, and ended up becoming liquidity

This year I gathered a lot of “experience” on @base, but was able to cash out very little because everyone was trying to learn how to grab a 1 M pot, and the result was ugly.

Even the memecoin on #Ethereum had roughly a 0.5 M chance, but it never materialized and mostly ended in loss.

In the end it taught us that sometimes brainwashing turns you into liquidity yourself.

Of course I learned my lesson during #x402; the value I didn’t sell ended up being far higher than the capital I originally placed, and now I can only lie low.

🌟 @Aster_DEX underestimated @cz_binance’s willingness to pump

Back then $ASTER really felt like a savings‑account idea; I estimated that at around 0.2 I should have sold, which would have given roughly a 1 000 % profit.

When the market opened I looked and saw the front‑end frozen. Luckily the tech guys were smart and had prepared API keys for all accounts.

When asked how to act, I said just smash it, so I placed an order at 0.055, then at 0.066 – not sure who took it.

That’s where the story began; I now owe many people a few million and am repaying debts!

That night a friend shouted “buy back at 0.15 all‑in”, I said I’d check in the morning; it opened at 0.4 and I couldn’t pull the trigger.

So when a group member asked what to do when $ASTER fell to 0.7, I said I ran at 0.066 – and when you ask me what to do after a 1 000 % jump, I have no answer.

Later I decided to trust CZ and BINANCE, and bought 1 % of $PALU for 28 M, but the people disappeared again.

🌟Luckily I hit @Lighter_xyz at the end of the year, grateful to the people along the way 7/10/10

Just a number: 10 % of all addresses on the network contributed, the other 7 % and 10 % are indescribable.

There’s an interesting story: we were all working on @AbstractChain, then thought it too messy and switched projects, and @hebi555 became the first to proclaim 2025 as the year of perp‑DEX.

Anyone who participated knows that grabbing 15 % of weekly rewards is hard 😂, especially after taking several weeks in a row – you develop a “fear” of the project, so you start lowering the amount you farm. Those who have farmed know the worry that the team might just hand the project over to you.

In the end I persisted, mainly because of the people around me, not because of myself.

Whether it’s @hebi555 constantly shouting “keep going”, the silent grinder @crypto_laodong, or the builder @snow949494, you can see them constantly talking about @Lighter_xyz on the timeline.

Apply the phrase “have you ever seen Los Angeles at 4 am?”.

You might not know the 0‑1‑2‑…‑24‑hour journey of @Lighter_xyz over the past nine months, but @crypto_laodong helped reveal it.

His mindset is truly solid; he never pops champagne midway, after checking the witch round he prepares for the worst, yet the final result is great – I haven’t seen anything better around.

You should know that the week we started checking the “witch” we were still tweaking the strategy; if we could have kept it until TGE, we might have earned another few hundred thousand points 😂, but we were scared the project would turn out too savage.

a. The road so far has been tough!

Going from March to December was hard – whether the cost was 0.1 U vs off‑chain 3 U, then 0.4 U vs 30 U, later 3 U vs 100 U, I kept wanting to pull some principal out, even to compound.

But the result was nobody wanted a single‑collateral loan 🤣; I once thought of becoming an OTC myself, guaranteeing myself, but I got lazy and dropped it.

b. Things I did not do well!

When I had 100 U I wanted to off‑load some tokens, but worried that points and tokens weren’t linearly related, making settlement hard, and I didn’t have enough USDT as collateral. A friend suggested a few million, but the risk was too high – OTC is a black box.

Hedging was also an issue; when the contract opened pre‑market it was about 75 U per 0.01, I thought about a crash‑before‑open but didn’t dare, only got 55 U per 0.01.

c. Must improve next time!

Hope the next one is better; after 25 years, 26 year @hebi555’s Mr. He said Predict Market is a wind‑pipe.

And @0xsexybanana’s “princess” said the next is #Robotics – who knows?

🌟An interesting incident

In October I visited a very spiritual “temple”, drew a lot, and was told to stay honest and follow others, never decide on my own, only let others lift me.

The other lots’ lots combined said that $LIT in December would be something “exaggerated”.

Because I only had that one thing that could cause a “critical hit”, it turned into a “boomerang” 🪃 in December – sometimes you just have to trust 😁.

Next time I’ll pay more respects, learned the right incense‑offering posture from the temple folks 😂.

✍️Afterword

This article was supposed to be posted on the 31st, but many things weren’t settled and a lot of coins weren’t gathered, so I delayed.

Now I stay low‑key, waiting for the next A9 to let @crypto_laodong report his 12‑year “fur” haul 🫡.

Thanks aren’t needed; too many people to @, everything is in the rice, eat up 🍚!!!

avatar

I’ll review this later; it’s been an interesting year.

First, thanks to @crypto_laodong, who after I sold off tens of millions of $ASTER under my guidance, also helped me farm some $LIT back. 🤥 https://t.co/kuXHkyHSoh

view 1
view 1
view 126
34 days ago
Trend of ZKJ after release
No Data
Neutral
The author reviews trades, emphasizing profit‑taking, stop‑loss and risk management, with profits from the Lighter_xyz project.
avatar
Revealing the evolution of altcoin market makers and profit-chopping tactics.

Speaking with modest authority, there are roughly three types of altcoin market making currently.

1. Requires creating hot topics through market actions such as shouting orders, thereby reducing capital input, achieving price increases, and using multi‑account funds to assist the "carrying the sedan chair". Essentially focuses on pulling (or slamming) spot and earning from contracts, involving relatively small amounts of capital, mainly operating in liquidity troughs. Primarily concentrated on second‑tier exchanges, barely considered as wild‑dealer territory. Chip concentration is not very important; it is an ultra‑short‑term operation. Extremely wary of insider (rat) trading.

2. Requires no market actions or market noise, relying entirely on funding rates or spot price movements to attract liquid capital. Chip control exceeds 95%; this approach typically demands very high chip concentration and a capital size of at least $10 million USD. A common tactic is to first achieve high control, then rally (or crush) to attract counterparties. The main profit comes from contracts, needing sufficient counterparties, while spot is sold through natural volume (pre‑phase often washes chips to lower cost). Not particularly fearful of insider trading, though insiders share in the profits.

2.5. This is essentially the second method, with at least 90% chip control. Going further, under high‑control conditions you first wash the chips, then exploit funding rates: when the funding rate is positive you push the market down, when it is negative you push it up. Funding rates heavily depend on counterparties; without counterparties they rarely become the main profit source, at best they act as “rent”. Real profit still comes from spot driving the contract direction. Completely unafraid of insider trading, and even welcomes insiders to help lift the sedan chair.

3. Purely violent control of the market, often seen in projects with large token releases such as airdrops. No need to explain further; a certain aggressive project had market‑making capital exceeding $100 million. Insider traders find it hard to survive to the end.

In most cases, the capital requirement for altcoin market makers ranges from about $10 million to $20 million. The project team handles borrowing the tokens, and the market maker’s main duties are threefold:

1. Maintain market capitalization.
2. Sell tokens + maintain market capitalization.
3. Sell tokens.

In fact, the first type is truly the "cutting the grass" scheme. The second type mainly profits from counterparties in the market, essentially a gamble they are willing to lose, while the third type is essentially a "dog dealer". The latter two do not make money through market direction; they merely eat the counterparties.

PS: The hardest thing about making money from contracts is not liquidations, but the lack of sufficient counterparties. Without enough counterparties, even massive capital cannot be absorbed.

Bitget VIP – lower fees, more aggressive benefits.

avatar

Altcoin secondary active market making, advancing into the 4.0 era.

Discussed market‑making topics with industry leaders in Dubai. After the reduction of reduction‑type market makers in the 2.0 era represented by Web3Port earlier this year, altcoin market makers entered a period where 2.0 and 3.0 coexist.

In the 3.0 era, market makers such as $ZKJ, $MYX, $MMT represent the model: leveraging large capital allocations, achieving extreme token control, and relying solely on wealthy forces to forcibly push and pull the market into volatile movements, profiting from liquidation contracts.

This has become the classic market‑making approach for altcoins today. However, large‑scale user liquidations generate community backlash and often hit exchanges (insurance funds), making it easy for exchanges to sanction participants, thus posing a risk that profits cannot be extracted.

Market makers have also begun to profit by driving high contract positions and extreme funding rates. Early cases show user position wear can reach up to 48% per day, without extreme market swings or liquidations, thereby avoiding losses to exchanges (insurance funds).

Under the 4.0 market‑making model, with roughly $100 million in contract positions, it is theoretically possible to earn tens of millions of dollars in just two days via funding rates. Whether this method can be sustained or scaled further remains to be seen.

view 157
view 45
view 62.2K
59 days ago
Trend of ZKJ after release
No Data
Neutral
Revealing the evolution of altcoin market makers and profit-chopping tactics.
avatar
The tweet discusses the massive contribution of retail investors to the crypto market, expresses fatigue but still longing for the market to rebound so they can continue participating.

✍️Industry contribution, what does it really amount to

Today, suddenly in the @BiliSquare group we talked about industry contribution. It's an interesting topic; each member claimed they haven't contributed to the industry, which I disagree with.

Although we are lowly, we 'green onions' still make a huge contribution.

🌟Liquidity contribution

I feel one of the biggest contributions we make is providing liquidity.

Whether it's the "organization fees" for each participant, the "charter flight and drinks", or the big guys' "luxury cars and mansions", even the "beach yachts with no one", I think all of those involve "our contribution".

Everything they have is thanks to our "silent effort", we are the ones "secretly transfusing", and as a result they "astonish the world" while we are forgotten.

🌟Various innovations

Actually many innovations are our heavy‑laden forward march; whether it's DeFi, Ponzi schemes, or whatever, everything loops back to us.

If we didn't love to rush in, would there be so many people launching projects?

Demand creates supply. It is because of our demand that so many people "forge ahead" to start businesses.

All "demands" are essentially "pseudo‑demands"; only those that make us "bravely surge forward" are "real demands".

As long as we green onions need something, someone will provide it.

Thus we, the green onions, are the primary productive force of the technological revolution.

🌟US‑stock rise is also us providing ammunition

Have you seen people who made money in various cryptos then move to US stocks?

Their money is transferred through the myriad "methods" we use.

Money doesn't appear out of thin air, but it can be "printed" out of thin air.

Think carefully: are the people around you who trade US stocks mostly from the crypto world?

Are the people who trade crypto the same ones who trade US stocks?

Did you have an instant enlightenment?

🌟Financial knowledge upgrade

Simply put, have you learned this much knowledge in the crypto world, especially finance‑related knowledge?

Whether it's K‑line technical indicators like MACD, RSI, etc.

You've learned wave theory, Dow theory, etc.

You've learned spot, margin, and futures contracts.

You've learned how the Fed's rate cuts and hikes affect the market.

You've learned what dovish and hawkish mean for the Fed.

You've learned about US stocks, A‑shares, Japanese stocks, Hong Kong stocks, etc.

You've learned about political geopolitics: US Republican vs Democratic relations, Middle East relations, etc.

You've learned about AI, robotics, X402, and more that will need to be learned in the future.

You've learned that predicting the market is not gambling, etc.

🌟You ask how big our contribution is

If you ask how big our green‑onion contribution is, it depends on how much is in my "wallet". As long as my "wallet keeps having money", my contribution can be "forever large".

If one day my "wallet gets drained", I might not be able to "contribute" anymore, only work for money to "contribute". 😭

After all, it's like the livestream ranking guy; once he has no money to boost rankings, he's no longer the big guy.

But now I still have breath, still "contribute". Can someone pull a project so I can "contribute" forever

view 35
view 24
view 12.5K
66 days ago
Trend of ZKJ after release
No Data
Extremely Bearish
The tweet discusses the massive contribution of retail investors to the crypto market, expresses fatigue but still longing for the market to rebound so they can continue participating.
Details

Price Prediction

When is a good time to buy ZKJ? Should I buy or sell ZKJ now?

When deciding whether it’s a good time to buy or sell Polyhedra Network (ZKJ), it’s important to first align with your own trading strategy and risk profile.Long-term investors and short-term traders often interpret market conditions differently, so your decision should reflect your personal approach. According to the latest ZKJ 4-hour technical analysis, the current trading signal is Sell. According to the latest ZKJ 1-day technical analysis, the current signal is Hold.
35
Sell
4-hour technical analysis of ZKJ
Last Update 2026-02-06 22:43:03
55
Hold
1-day technical analysis of ZKJ
Last Update 2026-02-06 22:43:03
beacon

Beacon Prediction

Probabilistic Price Forecast (Next 24 Hours)
crypto.loading
About Polyhedra Network
Polyhedra Network (ZKJ) is a cryptocurrency and operates on the Ethereum platform. Polyhedra Network has a current supply of 1,000,000,000 with 579,885,426.81135985 in circulation. The last known price of Polyhedra Network is 0.03024739 USD and is down -3.34 over the last 24 hours. It is currently trading on 194 active market(s) with $3,073,032.75 traded over the last 24 hours. More information can be found at https://polyhedra.network/.
Read More