Drift protocol (DRIFT)

$0.03780  -6.90%  24H

Soziale-Stimmungs-Index (SSI)

Marktimpuls-Ranking (MPR)

Beiträge auf X

  • fomo 🧠 OnChain_Analyst Trader C
     93.19K  @fomomofosol

    are we back?? https://t.co/kage8inHBZ

    gr3g D
     45.78K  @gr3gor14n

    drift protocol gets wiped for a quarter of a billion and a day later toly is shilling bernie senders coin https://t.co/V60cYXjxTg

     52  10  3.67K
    Original lesen >
    Trend von DRIFT nach Veröffentlichung
     Neutral
    DRIFT被清算,Ber币被推介,行情尚不明朗
  • Zach Humphries TA_Analyst Trader B
     136.78K  @ZachHumphries

    The $DRIFT exploit is a grim reminder that no TVL is ever 100% safe. Seeing over $270M leave the treasuries in under an hour is pure madness. The $DRIFT token is already nuking and liquidity is drying up fast. This looks like a classic admin key compromise rather than a code bug. Are we seeing a rotation out of $SOL ecosystem coins because of this?

     5  2  409
    Original lesen >
    Trend von DRIFT nach Veröffentlichung
     Extrem bärisch
    Drift protocol suffered a $270 million vulnerability attack, causing the DRIFT token to plunge and raising concerns about the SOL ecosystem.
  • Crypto En Afrique FA_Analyst Educator B
     4.10K  @CryptoEnAfrique

    Imagine having your project and getting hacked for over $100M on April 1st. You try to inform your community about the situation and the actions to take. They read it and think it's an April Fool's joke 😹. That's what happened to the Drift protocol on Solana.

    Drift D
     132.57K  @DriftProtocol

    Drift Protocol is experiencing an active attack. Deposits and withdrawals have been suspended. We are coordinating with multiple security firms, bridges, and exchanges to contain the incident. This is not an April Fools joke. We’ll provide additional updates from this account as more information is available to share.

     8  2  268
    Original lesen >
    Trend von DRIFT nach Veröffentlichung
     Bärisch
    Drift protocol on Solana is under attack, deposits and withdrawals halted, risk is extremely high
  • DeFi Warhol FA_Analyst OnChain_Analyst B
     41.46K  @Defi_Warhol

    I went through Drift’s incident thread, and this is the clearest play by play of what happened to @DriftProtocol ↓ March 23 The setup appears to have started here. Drift says 4 durable nonce accounts were created. That suggests parts of the attack were prepared in advance. Drift’s implication → At least 2 of 5 signer approvals were already tied to the setup March 27 Drift says the Security Council multisig was updated because one council member was replaced. It did not explain why. But the change did not fully remove the attacker’s path. March 30 A new durable nonce account was created for someone in the updated multisig. That suggests the attacker still had effective access to 2 of the 5 required signers. April 1 Drift spotted unusual activity. Users were told not to deposit. Deposits and withdrawals were suspended shortly after. Later that day, Drift says there was a legitimate-looking test withdrawal from the insurance fund. About a minute later, 2 pre-signed durable nonce transactions were executed. Those transactions created and approved a malicious admin transfer. After that, the attacker gained control of Drift’s Security Council admin powers. With that control, the attacker added a malicious asset, removed withdrawal limits, and drained the protocol. Around $280M was withdrawn from: borrow/lend deposits, vault deposits, and trading deposits. Drift says this was not a smart contract bug and there is no evidence of compromised seed phrases. Their response: → Freeze the remaining protocol functions → Remove the compromised wallet from the multisig → Work with security firms, bridges, exchanges, and law enforcement From the looks of it. I'm thinking that this might be an inside job.

     55  8  3.79K
    Original lesen >
    Trend von DRIFT nach Veröffentlichung
     Bärisch
    DRIFT遭内部攻击,约2.8亿美元被盗,前景堪忧
  • Emperor Osmo 🐂 🎯 FA_Analyst OnChain_Analyst B
     92.28K  @Flowslikeosmo

    More crazy to watch $DRIFT price to TVL over the past year. Signs were there. https://t.co/DIA7HrMSti https://t.co/aeMQfN1Hza

    aaalex.hl D
     16.82K  @aaalexhl

    Kinda crazy to see 50% of TVL just wiped out in 2 days https://t.co/S0sq5HDmqp https://t.co/CRg1mfm56r

     8  4  1.53K
    Original lesen >
    Trend von DRIFT nach Veröffentlichung
     Extrem bärisch
    DRIFT's TVL plummeted 50% within two days, and the token price and TVL chart show a long‑term downtrend.
  • Eliza Influencer Media C
     88.24K  @WEB3Eliza
    Eliza Influencer Media C
     88.24K  @WEB3Eliza

    Call me dummy cuz im not technical But drift protocol had huge red flags if people could see it Imo if people knew anything about the security layer of this protocol, they could minimize their loss before the attack 😢 Drift protocol: - running 2/5 multisig - ZERO timelock - durable nonces Industry standard for $500 mil+ tvl: - min 3/5 or 4/7 multisig - Mandatory 24-28 hrs on all admin actions - separation of powers ( different keys for different functions) Why? 😭

     94  34  1.89K
    Original lesen >
    Trend von DRIFT nach Veröffentlichung
     Bärisch
    Drift protocol has serious security flaws, recommend staying flat.
  • BANDR ALOTAIBI 🇸🇦 Media Influencer D
     1.23K  @bandr283

    🚨 The Drift Protocol hack exemplifies the real risks of decentralized protocols. When a trading platform is breached for billions of dollars, users lose their money directly because smart contracts do not have a “stop button”. ⚠️ The basic lesson: security audits and insurance are not optional but essential before depositing capital. #اختراق_البلوكتشين #DeX_Security #الأمان_الرقمي #DriftProtocol #العملات_الرقمية #Crypto_Hack #Web3_Safety

     0  0  22
    Original lesen >
    Trend von DRIFT nach Veröffentlichung
     Bärisch
    Drift was hacked leading to user losses; invest cautiously.
  • Henri TA_Analyst Trader C
     7.86K  @HenriLee92
    aidenpark.eth D
     256  @adn_park

    Just yesterday the Drift protocol was hacked. The loss is estimated at over 400 billion KRW, which accounts for more than half of Drift's TVL. The root cause of the hack, loosely put, is the biggest hacking incident in crypto history—the Bybit hack—and the recent Resolve hack. An admin‑privileged multi‑sig account was stolen through social engineering, and the attack leveraged Solana’s unique Durable Nonce mechanism. In simple terms, the hacker fooled the Drift administrators by signing as if it were a normal transaction, gathered those signatures, and when they judged everything was ready, detonated them all at once. In fact, when I saw this series of events, a photo came to mind: workers building skyscrapers in New York during the 1920s–30s. Modern people can’t help but be shocked by the image—workers sitting on steel beams eating lunch, smoking, even taking naps, all without any basic safety measures. Yet for them it was normal. Everyone worked that way, safety rules and equipment didn’t exist, and if they did, they were just cumbersome demands from outsiders. I think today’s crypto scene isn’t that different from that picture. We are constructing skyscrapers that embody cutting‑edge science, yet the workers seem to operate without proper safety gear; the crypto industry is growing daily and now sits at a historic turning point with governments and institutions entering. Still, we rely on worn‑out, outdated safety mechanisms, holding assets worth hundreds of billions to trillions as collateral. The hack is described as a sophisticated attack using social engineering and Durable Nonce, but in reality it could have been prevented with very simple safety measures. For example, even if the admin transaction is approved via multi‑sig, without a final execution check …

     11  1  478
    Original lesen >
    Trend von DRIFT nach Veröffentlichung
     Bärisch
    Drift protocol suffered a massive hack, and the author warns of insufficient security protection in the crypto industry.
  • 𝕋𝕖𝕞𝕞𝕪🦇🔊 DeFi_Expert Educator C
     41.33K  @Only1temmy
    𝕋𝕖𝕞𝕞𝕪🦇🔊 DeFi_Expert Educator C
     41.33K  @Only1temmy

    i can't stop thinking about the drift protocol hack. not because of the $280m. we've seen big numbers before. i can't stop thinking about how it happened. and what it says about everything we're building. on april 1st, while people were posting jokes, an attacker drained $280 million from drift protocol in minutes. the team had to literally tweet "this is not an april fools joke." but this didn't start on april 1st. it started on march 23rd. that's when the attacker created four durable nonce accounts. two tied to drift's own security council multisig members. two controlled by the attacker. quietly. no alarms. no flags. on march 27th, drift migrated their security council due to a routine member change. by march 30th, the attacker had already compromised a signer on the new multisig too. then on april 1st, they executed. a test transaction first. then one minute later, two pre-signed transactions fired four slots apart. admin takeover. withdrawal limits removed. a malicious asset introduced. every vau

     595  90  63.54K
    Original lesen >
    Trend von DRIFT nach Veröffentlichung
     Bärisch
    Drift protocol was hacked, resulting in a $280 million theft, and its outlook has deteriorated.
  • Badwi Crypto Media Educator C
     33.57K  @BadwiCrypto

    🚨 The repercussions of the @DriftProtocol hack are spreading to Solana: 📈 Number of affected projects rises from 11 to 20 projects 💸 Total breach exceeds $285 million Source: @SolanaFloor https://t.co/MoECGJFBz1

    Badwi Crypto Media Educator C
     33.57K  @BadwiCrypto

    🚨 Massive hack shakes the DeFi ecosystem on Solana: 💸 Protocol @DriftProtocol suffers a breach valued over $220 million 📉 The token crashes 30% in minutes 🔴 Largest DeFi hack on @solana since the Wormhole breach https://t.co/k61ZnALozl

     11  1  1.77K
    Original lesen >
    Trend von DRIFT nach Veröffentlichung
     Extrem bärisch
    Drift Protocol suffered a massive attack, causing DRIFT token price to plunge 30%, impacting the Solana ecosystem.